Jump to content

User talk:河蟹~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Single Payer

[edit]

I don't know if you are the same person as this user but it seems possible, in which case you would be violating WP:SOCK. Just a warning in case that's what is going on, and if you admit to it now you can avoid any problems in terms of a block in the future.

Regardless, please discuss this change on the article talk page. It does break convention as you admit, you have no consensus for it, it isn't necessary, and it's actually inaccurate since "insurance" need not (and generally does not) have anything to do with single-payer systems. I've already reverted more than I would prefer and am going to let it sit for now, but unless you get consensus from other editors we are not going to change away from Wikipedia convention for lead paragraphs simply because you think we should. Please head to Talk:Single-payer health care to discuss this. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 20:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your talk page post, but please, do not assume bad faith and accuse me of breaking policy when you are frustrated with the community's emerging consensus against your preferred lead wording. 河蟹 (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did not assume bad faith, I wondered if you were the same person editing as an IP address, which you have not answered. I'm willing to think that could be an honest mistake on your part, or that it's a coincidence that an IP made a change, I reverted it, and a brand new account showed up out of nowhere to revert it. That can happen, but I was expressing a concern that there is some logged in/logged out editing going on. Again you did not address the issue squarely.
And please don't remark on "the community's emerging consensus." The existing consensus is for the version I reverted to, and two edits (by you and the IP editor) do not change anything. You're supposed to get consensus before you make the change - not present a fait accompli after the fact. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 21:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am not any editor who has previously edited that article. 河蟹 (talk) 22:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are ways to verify that, which I might pursue, so I hope you're telling the truth. If not your account would be blocked. Fair warning.
And of course you ignored my second point about consensus, both here and on the article talk page. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 00:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad username?

[edit]

Your username clearly states your opinions on politics. You ought to change that. Kayau Voting IS evil 03:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

03:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

21:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)