User talk:庄心勖

May 2017

Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. Your recent edit to the page M22 Locust appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 13:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Weapons of the Vietnam War. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 13:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to MP 18. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Scr★pIron^IV 13:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Anmccaff. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Weapons of the Vietnam War have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anmccaff (talk) 13:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. * Repeated unsourced inclusion of the Vietnam War to weapons systems that were not utilized in that conflict Scr★pIron^IV 14:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Weapons of the Vietnam War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. As you have been informed many times already, STOP adding weapons to the Weapons of the Vietnam War article without including a source for that information. Especially since many of your additions are factually incorrect. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:48, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons of the Vietnam War.

You have been repeatedly added weapons and equipment which could not have played any part in this conflict, weapons which did not play any part, weapons which -may- have played a part, weapons which -may- have played a very, very, small part, and weapons which may have been more in the "spy" category than the "soldier." This may have resulted in some accurate additions being thrown out as well. You have added little or no sourcing to support these changes, and you've simply reverted to your preferred version when it is questioned. You appear to have been doing this for a while, as an IP editor.

You need to add decent sourcing, or (possibly accurate) information is going to be removed out of hand. Anmccaff (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Panzerfaust. BilCat (talk) 06:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Type 96 light machine gun. BilCat (talk) 08:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: The user is continuing the same pattern of unsourced edits for which you blocked them. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 08:15, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's Noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding unsourced additions. The thread is 庄心勖 on Weapons of the Vietnam War and elsewhere.. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content. If this behaviour continues after this block, the next block will be indefinite.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 22:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ping blocking Admin

@Black Kite: - Note that this editor is making the same disruptive and unsourced edits again, this time as IP 1.56.61.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Scr★pIron^IV 11:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Weapons of the Vietnam War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Jungle Carbine. Scr★pIron^IV 12:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist:, @Black Kite: Pinging admins familiar w/ this user. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Weapons of the Vietnam War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 10:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC) @El C, Materialscientist, and Black Kite:, this user is returning to the same editing pattern. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 10:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for continuing to add unsourced material after two previous blocks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 11:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/庄心勖, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]