User talk:ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ. Thank you for your work on Bapi Tudu. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ Good start! Thank you for your contribution. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 07:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ. Thank you for your work on Rani Murmu. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ Good start! but please don't write article like a resume of person in a promotional tone and need editing to as per the neutral point-of-view policy. Thank you

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 11:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dcotos Ok, I will keep this in mind next time.ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 11:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dcotos By the way thank you for review.ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 11:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Bapi Tudu, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay Ok, I understood.

ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 03:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sita Soren, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 22:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haludpukur railway station moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Haludpukur railway station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it uses a fan site as source and does not fulfill WP:NTRAINSTATION. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Broc, once I complete the article, I will submit it for review. ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! If you want me to review it, I will gladly do so, just ping me when you're ready. Otherwise I will leave it for another editor. Broc (talk) 19:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biography notability

Hello ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ, I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia. Upon looking at four articles you recently created—Anjali Kisku, Bapi Tudu, Rani Murmu, and Salge Hansdah. I noticed that they do not meet the notability criteria for biographies of living persons. While you have cited some reliable sources, they are all related to a single event, the Sahitya Akademi Yuva Puraskar. As a result, these articles may be redirected to the "List of Yuva Puraskar winners for Santali" in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines WP:BIO1E. If you believe these articles should remain independent, you will need to provide secondary sources to establish their notability.

Thanks ~ MaxA-Matrix 🗨 17:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @MaxA-Matrix Thank you for your message. I understand the concern regarding the notability criteria for the articles I created. I will review the guidelines and work on providing additional secondary sources to establish the subjects' notability beyond their recognition for the Sahitya Akademi Yuva Puraskar. If there are any other specific guidelines or recommendations you have, please let me know.

Thanks ~ ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 07:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mission OlChiki 2025 (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Ol Chiki script. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mission OlChiki 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haludpukur railway station (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Haludpukur railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Basen Murmu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Basen Murmu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basen Murmu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GrabUp - Talk 07:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Grabup, Thank you for reviewing my article. I've endeavoured to write it to the best of my ability, carefully selecting appropriate secondary references. If any issues arise regarding Wikipedia's policies, I'm actively correcting and refining the article. I would appreciate any assistance you can provide in this regard.

ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ (talk) 07:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Haludpukur railway station

Hello, ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haludpukur railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hod hopon ren pera

Hello, ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hod hopon ren pera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Haludpukur railway station

Hello, ᱤᱧ ᱢᱟᱛᱟᱞ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Haludpukur railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]