User talk:தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன்

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன், and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Ref desk question

Your question, "nova & dwarf nova difference?", has received a reply on the science reference desk. Brammers (talk/c) 22:16, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do keep contributing!

Hi தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன்! My apologies if my comments didn't sound friendly. Please do keep contributing - the English language Wikipedia needs many more speakers of the languages of the subcontinent! --Shirt58 (talk) 13:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Re:Thondi

Hi Subramanian, I cannot read tamil that well. It looks like you found some issues with the Tamil article on Thondi. Please reach to this link, Alamarathu Adi and present your concern. I am sure other Tamil Wikipedians will respond. — Ganeshk (talk) 10:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Ref desk question

Your question, Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous#Which kingdom rules more than 2000 years continuously?, has received responses. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 15:10, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

The link to blogspot that you gave in your latest Reference Desk question is blank, as of now... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.253.89.68 (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Now i checked that link. That is opened correctly. Please again check that Link.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your Credo Reference account is approved

Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.

• Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent. You'll receive the email within about two weeks.
• If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
• Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
• Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
• If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 19:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your Credo account access has been sent to your email!

All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.

• If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
• If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cattle raiding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

New == == sections

You make misleading edit summaries with your habit to make new sections (to append something to the last existing section). Use a civilized way – wise MediaWiki developers already provided the right way to add topics to talk pages. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I'm not able to understand your words. Are you saying == Topic == is better than ==Topic==--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 12:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh! Now I understood. From now onwards I'll add "New sections" by clicking 'New section' option.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 06:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm K6ka. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tamil-Brahmi, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. K6ka (talk | contrib) 14:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Er, sorry about that. Looks like I made a mistake! You can remove this warning. K6ka (talk | contrib) 14:33, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

I didn't remove any content. I describe why I moved (Not removed) the reference clearly in "Edit Summary".

//Tamil is not under the category of Indo-Aryan Languages, or Prakrit or Sanskrit//--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 14:35, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Looking at your contributions, I didn't notice any edit summary. After careful looking, I noticed that you've added your edit summary right in the section indicator (e.g. /* December 2013 */ ), which is automatically generated when you edit a specific section instead of the entire page. Next time, add your edit summary after the /* December 2013 */ , so it will be easier for other editors to read your edit summary. Thanks! K6ka (talk | contrib) 14:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Oh. Ok. Thanks.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, and Merry Christmas, if you celebrate it. :) K6ka (talk | contrib) 14:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Warning

Don't delete tags from articles or I will ask to have you blocked for edit warring. As explained to you many times, we use secondary sources on WP. As long as you make contested claims using only primary sources, not as a claim but as the only fact we report, that fact can an should be tagged as dubious. — kwami (talk) 17:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

You can't warn me like this. I remove the dubious template after I gave the reason in Talk Page.

1. First time you deleted the three references given by me. [1] This activity is completely against to wiki rules. I didn't delete any source. I just moved every source given by you to Post Dispersal subheading. You can't warn me in my talk page like this.
2. I request some other administrator come to that page and say what is correct. Because Kwami's activity is against to wikipedia.

//I will ask to have you blocked for edit warring.//

) First you say the reason why you delete three sources? Otherwise I will ask to have you blocked for edit warring. Sorry. You delete the sources right? It is Vandalism. I ask other administrator to block your user ID.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tiger versus lion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Redirect Varnasrama

See Talk:Varnasrama. --Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi

Your edits in Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi is not looking nuetral. WP is not a place to express your political opinions. Edits are made here in a neutral point of view See WP:NPOV and as a consensus among editors See WP:CON. Please discuss the issue in the talk page before making your edit. Rameshnta909 (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

//Your edits in Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi is not looking nuetral.//

That is for you.

//WP is not a place to express your political opinions.//

How did you know this is my Political opinion?

//Edits are made here in a neutral point of view See WP:NPOV and as a consensus among editors See WP:CON.//

Thanks. But I knew this.

//Please discuss the issue in the talk page before making your edit. //|

I included the sentences with references as well as interlink. So you only need to talk before making your edits without interlinks and reference.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 16:50, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

This is the sentence added by you in the article. MDMA suggests Subramania Swamy along with Chandraaamy in this assasintaion case. You honestly think this is the way to add content in an encyclopedia? Rameshnta909 (talk) 16:56, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

//You honestly think this is the way to add content in an encyclopedia?//

Then what is the way to add this sentence? If you want to delete the sentence eventhough it was quoted with reference means you only need to talk before your edit. Not me.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 17:04, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please talk about the edit in the talk page Talk:Assassination_of_Rajiv_Gandhi#Nationalist Rameshnta909 (talk) 15:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, you may be blocked from editing. Rameshnta909 (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

How can you block from me for editing with references and interlinks? Wikipedia is not your personal blog.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 17:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:தென்காசி_சுப்பிரமணியன் reported by User:Rameshnta909 (Result: ). Thank you. Rameshnta909 (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Oh Great Thanks.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Wifione ^Message 18:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Yep. I have edited all times with references only. But the users who undo my edits didn't conversate in that article talk page before deleting the content eventhough that sentence was referenced. Can you give the valid reason for blocking me?

For Ex:

1. User Ebyabe gave edit summary like ( google search is not a valid reference, need a specific book or website. (TW) )

I undo it by adding with proper edit summary only.

Click the [link https://www.google.co.in/search?q=Jain+Commission+subramnia+swamy&oq=Jain+Commission+subramnia+swamy&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.16000j0j8&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=MDMA+under+CBI+was+constituted+to+probe+the+role+of+Subramanian+Swamy+as+he+was+suspected+along+with+Chandra+Swamy.+Subramanian+Swamy+published+his+book+in+defence+of+himself%2C&tbm=bks]. This link guides only to the google book which have that content.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC) ~~~~}}

• Please read wp:edit warring. Of particular importance would be wp:3RR. You did more than 3 reverts within a period of 24 hours. That's the main reason you were blocked. If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask. resume discussions on the talk page of the article after your block has been lifted. Follow the procedure listed out at wp:dispute resolution to work out your problems. If you get into another revert war, the scaling up of the block would be immediate. I'm watching the page from hereon. So kindly be patient while editing; there is no hurry to revert. Wifione ^Message 09:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution page says like this.

//For example, if an article appears biased, add balancing material or make the wording more neutral. Include citations for any material you add.//

I have added citations and make my edit. But other users revert just like that.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 00:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Latest edits to Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi

First of all I request you to forget the unfortunate episode of an edit war between us regarding this page. Please understand that my only intention was to improve the page. Your latest efforts in the page shows your respect for the policies of NPOV and consensus. I really appreciate the gesture and hoping to work with you to improve the page. Rameshnta909 (talk) 09:06, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Militant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன். Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Cosmic  Emperor  15:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

User:CosmicEmperor May I know the purpose of the mail? I don't have internet on my home. In my office mail is restricted.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 15:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

I am not an expert in every subject. There are lots of topics about which i have little knowledge. I wanted you to check a page as I thought it does not have much notability according to my view. I never read about it in newspapers. I think it's like someone made a mountain from a molehill.Attacks on Sri Lankans in Tamil Nadu .I regularly follow local newspapers and news sites but never such things were highlighted. It's up to you whether you want to check that page. I won't edit that page as i don't have much knowledge about that topic.--Cosmic  Emperor  15:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Yasin Malik, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

User:Kautilya3 I expect you the same before you revert my edit.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea what that means. The editor adding content is required to provide reliable sources. - Kautilya3 (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Did you revert my edit with reliable sources? Your revert wasn't neutral. No reliable sources provided in that content, before I edit that content as well as after you revert my edit. --Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

You appear to be confused about how Wikipedia works. I suggest that you discuss your issue at the Teahouse and get advice. - Kautilya3 (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm not confused. Neutrality should be biased. If you are lack in identifying Reliable sources verify Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Your revert wasn't neutral. No reliable sources provided in that content, before I edit that content as well as after you revert my edit.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 19:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

ARBIPA notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 22:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Hindu philosophy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I have edited with references and citations. I am sure that I am familiar with the policies.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Template:Hindu philosophy. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

User:Kautilya3 First you should know the basic Wiki Policies. If I ask citations means You should give references and remove my edits. But without doing this you only pulled me to edit war. After that also I was quoting Citations or Article Parts contain Citations remove your Vandalism edits.

So I always continuing wiki policies. But you always continuing your edit war without quoting citations or Article Parts contain Citations. So move all these templates to your talk page.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 14:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Pointless templates

Hello. Pointlessly "mirroring" back a template you have received, like you did here and here, is simply trolling, and unhelpful to say the least. Joshua Jonathan hasn't been editing disruptively, and Kautilya3 hasn't been edit warring, so you have no basis for it. You're lucky that Joshua Jonathan is such a laid-back guy. (Kautilya3 hasn't responded yet.) Please don't post in such a manner again, or it will result in loss of editing privileges. Bishonen | talk 15:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC).

From starting onwards I am asking for citations. Without giving that they making reverts just like that means that must be a edit war as well as disruptive.

Even I confused the user Sarah and Joshua, I make reverts only with quoting citations or giving article part which have enough citations in edit summary. So I am following wiki policies. But not Kautilya. So the template here is not pointless.

And see this anonymous user edit also.[2]--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Oh, come on. Kautilya3 has edited the template exactly once, ever. Don't tell him, or me, that he's "engaged in an edit war". Please don't use warning templates until you get a better understanding of what edit warring, or for that matter disruption, means. Read the edit warring policy; you have been referred to it enough times. Bishonen | talk 23:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC).

When you discover that there is a disagreement, the normal practice is to discuss with other editors the issues surrounding the disagreement and attempt to reach consensus. The main page should be left as is until consensus is reached. The reason for the warning template is that you have continued reinstating your edits even after it became clear that there was disagreement. - Kautilya3 (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Kautilya3, So what about your disagreement in changing Related Non-Hindu Indian philosophies to Related Indian Philosophies? Did you follow the same procedure that you mentioned above? Never. Your statements are not neutral. You only always start edit war.--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 00:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Please see WP:BRD for the recommended protocol. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன். Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன். Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன். Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன். Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)