Jump to content

User talk:विशाल कुमार मौर्य

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hi विशाल कुमार मौर्य! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Maurya Empire several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Maurya Empire, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HistoryofIran,
Thank you for reaching out and addressing the concerns regarding the edits made to the Maurya Empire page. I appreciate your reminder about the edit warring policy and the importance of seeking consensus through discussion.
I completely understand the need for accuracy and authenticity in Wikipedia articles, especially when it comes to historical information and maps. It's crucial to ensure that the content presented is well-sourced and reliable. If you believe that the map currently used on the Maurya Empire page is unauthentic or neglected, I encourage you to bring up this issue on the article's talk page.
By initiating a discussion on the talk page, you can engage with other editors and share your concerns about the map's accuracy. This collaborative approach can lead to a productive exchange of ideas and potentially result in a consensus on whether the map needs to be replaced or modified. If needed, you can also explore dispute resolution options to involve a broader group of editors and experts in the decision-making process.
Once again, I appreciate your commitment to maintaining the quality and reliability of Wikipedia articles. Your efforts in ensuring accurate historical information are valuable contributions to the platform.
Best regards, विशाल कुमार मौर्य (talk) 07:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The decision to delete a distorted Mauryan Empire map from a Wiki page is based on several valid reasons that stem from the lack of authenticity and historical accuracy of the map. The following reasons provide a comprehensive explanation for the removal of the misrepresented map:
1. Inaccurate Representation: The distorted map inaccurately represents the territorial extent and boundaries of the Mauryan Empire. Such a misrepresentation can lead to confusion among readers who are seeking accurate information about the historical context.
2. Lack of Archaeological Support : The Indian Archaeological Survey of India, a reputable institution responsible for the accurate documentation of historical sites and artifacts, has not endorsed the authenticity of the distorted map. The absence of archaeological evidence supporting the map's accuracy raises doubts about its reliability.
3. Historical Textbook Neglect : The fact that Indian history textbooks, which are typically comprehensive and thoroughly researched, do not include the misrepresented map is a strong indication of its lack of historical validity. Educational materials that are widely accepted and used in academic settings are expected to be based on well-established historical research.
4. Potential Misinformation : Including a map that is not endorsed by archaeological and historical authorities can lead to the spread of misinformation. Wiki pages should strive to provide accurate and reliable information to readers, and the presence of a misrepresented map contradicts this objective.
5. Maintaining Scholarly Integrity : Wiki pages, particularly those related to historical subjects, aim to maintain a high level of scholarly integrity by presenting well-researched and substantiated information. Including a map that does not meet these standards undermines the credibility of the Wiki page and the platform as a whole.
6. Promotion of Misconceptions : Misrepresented maps can perpetuate misconceptions and distortions about historical events, ultimately hindering a more accurate understanding of the Mauryan Empire and its significance in Indian history.
7. Avoiding Bias : Wiki pages should prioritize neutral and unbiased information, and the inclusion of a distorted map could potentially introduce bias or confusion among readers who are seeking an objective understanding of the Mauryan Empire.
The decision to delete a distorted Mauryan Empire map from a Wiki page is grounded in the need to uphold historical accuracy, scholarly integrity, and the responsible dissemination of information to readers. By removing such a map, the Wiki page can ensure that its content aligns with established historical research and reputable sources, thereby enhancing its educational value and reliability. विशाल कुमार मौर्य (talk) 07:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Kushtana

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kushtana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrBauer24 (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Common 🙄 , He is the founder of khotan Empire. You calling him imaginery.
Read it Kingdom of Khotan#Historical timeline section.
I just keep some content their with that reference. विशाल कुमार मौर्य (talk) 14:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have doubt that you're misunderstanding. Please read about Kushtana who is the son of Ashoka. In my country, this is in our BEd history syllabus. विशाल कुमार मौर्य (talk) 14:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I hope after confirmation and checking all you remove the speedy deletion. विशाल कुमार मौर्य (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

विशाल कुमार मौर्य (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for my past actions on Wikipedia and request an opportunity to contribute constructively. At the time of my previous edits, I was inexperienced and did not fully understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I now recognize the importance of these rules and am committed to adhering to them in the future. :I understand that creating multiple accounts for illegitimate reasons is against Wikipedia policy, and I deeply regret my actions. I am willing to learn and improve my editing skills so that I can make valuable contributions to Wikipedia's content. I promise to follow all Wikipedia guidelines, including those related to neutrality, verifiability, and sourcing. I will also seek guidance from experienced editors and actively participate in discussions to ensure that my contributions align with Wikipedia's high standards. : Bbb23 Sir, I kindly request that you reconsider my indefinite block and give me a chance. I am eager to make amends and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.विशाल कुमार मौर्य (talk) 10:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We will not consider lifting your block here. Make your request with your original account. You'll also want to address your blatantly inappropriate edits and your obvious attempt to mislead us here with your clearly false claim you didn't know about our policies around abuse of multiple accounts. You clearly knew this, having been previously caught and blocked for violating this policy. Yamla (talk) 10:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

विशाल कुमार मौर्य (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, please verify my claim that the Harimaurya account does not belong to me. I kindly request that you compare my IP address with the IP address associated with the Harimaurya account. :Last month, after reading a page about Mori king Chitrangada, I examined the page history and was inspired by an editor named Magadhahistorian. I also reviewed their contributions and, regrettably, I began editing due to my lack of experience. After my initial block by you , I created another account named Sarvahitkari.विशाल कुमार मौर्य (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. The evidence shown by Yamla is damning. RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Confirmed:

Frankly, you aren't very good at covering your tracks. --Yamla (talk) 10:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:विशाल_कुमार_मौर्य&oldid=1174601824"