User talk:فدایی جوان

License tagging for File:داوود سرخوش.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:داوود سرخوش.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:داوود سرخوش.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:داوود سرخوش.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:داوود سرخوش.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:داوود سرخوش.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:داوود سرخوش.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:داوود سرخوش.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:MuhammaMuhaqqiq.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MuhammaMuhaqqiq.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hamid Rahimi Boxer.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Hamid Rahimi Boxer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:07, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MuhammaMuhaqqiq.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MuhammaMuhaqqiq.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ظاهر هویدا.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ظاهر هویدا.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 12:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked on Commons for a week recently for exactly this ... so you upload copyright violations here instead. There are no excuses. MER-C 12:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

فدایی جوان (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me I want to edit with this account. Now I am not a vandaler --فدایی جوان (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for vandalism, you are blocked for copyright violation, and your unblock request does not address that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

فدایی جوان (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not upload these kinds of files Which is against Copyright violations --فدایی جوان (talk) 14:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Alright, but this is not sufficient; many blocked editors make appropriate-sounding commitments without showing full understanding of the nature of the problem leading to their block. Please, in your next request, explain to us which files may and which files may no be downloaded, and how you can tell which is which.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Anthony Bradbury

I did not know much about Wikipedia that time. If I edit from an another account then it's not fair. --فدایی جوان (talk) 15:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite clear on reading your edits that you do not possess a complete command of the English language; it might be better if you were to restrict your editing to the Wikipedia of your own language. I do not fully understand your last comment, but if you mean that you are using another account to edit here while blocked I must tell you that this is not allowed. It is not just this account which is blocked; it is you, the editor, personally. You may not edit here at all while your account is blocked.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anthony Bradbury

So it's better to block me permanently, and remove unblock tools (The ways to unblock) from this page.

I will edit in my own language.

In future I will edit in this English Wikipedia from an another User account.

--فدایی جوان (talk) 16:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you edit the English Wikipedia from another account and it is discovered, that account will be blocked too, as you are not allowed to use other accounts here while this one is blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Boing! said Zebedee

The blocked users can't edit from their blocked user accounts. --فدایی جوان (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know that. And a blocked user is not allowed to use another account to evade that block. You are only allowed to edit the English Wikipedia if the block on this account is overturned. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I say again; you are not allowed to use another account here. If you do, and if you continue to post edits which breach copyright, the new account will be blocked and your edits made with it will be deleted. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anthony Bradbury

excuse me! but this a big punishment for blocked users, I am sure most of blocked users are trying to create new user accounts.

--فدایی جوان (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you have, through your own fault, lost editing rights to this page. But I will answer your last comment; no, most blocked editors do not create new accounts. They follow instructions to achieve unblock, as you could have done. My request was clear and easy to understand, and you ignored it. To request unblock here, go to WP:UTRS. I remind you, any further account you create will be blocked.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Television stations in Afghanistan

Template:Television stations in Afghanistan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noor TV Afghanistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noor TV Afghanistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noor TV Afghanistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]