User talk:שחר1979

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Booza has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -petiatil ^{»user»speak} 09:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the value "Dondurma" (Turkish gum ice cream) should unite with the value "Booza" (Arabic gum ice cream). burekas (talk) 09:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic translations

Hi, when are you going to stop your automatic translations. Don't you understand that you cannot create an article like that? That it doesn't make any sense? I warn you, if you continue doing automatic translations, I will ask your account to be blocked in all wikis as it is already the case on hebrew wiki.--Kimdime (talk) 12:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Just looking for the embassy on other Wikipedia and I did not found . burekas (talk) 12:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well if nobody is able to translate it for you, don't do it yourself, and I have to say that your english is not good enough either to make major editions into the english wikipedia, neither mine (I'm a french speaker), this is why I only do minor edits here. Your atitude is disrespectful to others editors, it require a lot of work to correct your language mistakes, this is an encyclopedia project, not a playground where you can do whatever... By the way, why have you be banned from the hebrew wikipedia?--Kimdime (talk) 12:53, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To ask something in an other wikipedia, go in Wikipedia:Village pump and check out the interwikis.--Kimdime (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you as Wikipedia veteran know if any " particular Wikipedia " you can ask for their paper " translation ? . Why I was banished from the " Hebrew Wikipedia " ? ... it's a long story. There are many complaints from people They began to wrote or Write a long time and deported from there becouse a form of management there. A bunch of people they think they can do everything and even expel "veteran writers. I'm not that great scholar, but as a "new writing" I keep where I was absorbing insults and very few people would come to help me there " And there is free access to writing like that here " and That's why many academics and scientists left the Hebrew Wikipedia. I could already see how much there is dismissive attitude towards each other. They also block people "without explaining why!" Because of nonsense "that the way they look!" Even though it goes against the laws of Wikipedia. I've been asked to go back many times there and nobody wants to listen, They did not give me any chance to return after I argued with them and even received threats that I will not go back again, And this is why many Israelis prefer to write in other Wikipedia. burekas (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you're telling me not to translate, I would turn to other Wikipedia and ask them where I can request that translate articles. burekas (talk) 13:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Pages

Please don't remove comments from talk pages. Beastiepaws (talk) 22:50, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But these comments are silly and not important and occupy a place on the call page. burekas (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, there's no need to delete. Beastiepaws (talk) 23:28, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mastic Article

Could you please stop what you're doing to the Mastic article? You keep adding claims without sources, and frankly, your English is not good enough for this. Beastiepaws (talk) 18:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

what now ? ... it is from the cooking books. i think one day you may return to the history of the article and return all the words you deleted. burekas (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well-- no. I'm not putting anything more back in. It's enough to try to keep the article in intelligible English without trying to research claims that you won't provide sources for. Beastiepaws (talk)

why are you so heavy ?, if i had " books in english " insted of " books in hebrew " i can show you this. but you insist to delet it. so until i found this in english. burekas (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:Cite and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Beastiepaws (talk) 22:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also deleting things because they're in such bad English that I can't make sense of them. Beastiepaws (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

please mighty god make me grow amd learn more english and other things . and " in god we trust " ! :) . burekas (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Guidelines

Citing sources in Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beastiepaws (talk • contribs) 21:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]