User talk:Գարիկ Ավագյան/Archive 2

Խնդրանք

Ողջույն Գարիկ, երբ էլ համակարգ մտնես, եթե դժվար չի լինի, խնդրում եմ միանաս այս էջին [1]--6AND5 (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alternativ

The article Alternativ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable band. Doesn't pass WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 21:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, StarBoyGarik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, StarBoyGarik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, StarBoyGarik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian Sketches moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Armenian Sketches, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Guy (Help!) 21:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Գարիկ Ավագյան

User:Գարիկ Ավագյան, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Գարիկ Ավագյան and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Գարիկ Ավագյան during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (help!) 16:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glen Sharkey and football

Sorry, I should have been clearer in my clarification request. What I meant was, What sort of football should be linked to? I would guess you mean association football, but in Australia & NZ there a few sports that are sometimes called just "football", so I am reluctant to presume. Cheers! —ShelfSkewed Talk 14:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I changed to the "soccer" (association football) Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk)

Independence of sources

Picking through the Sharkey material, I see that the sources you cited were:

site of the organization of which Mr. Sharkey is president. Not independent.
Facebook page of the organization through which he can be hired. Not independent, as they benefit financially from him receiving publicity.
his own Facebook page. Obviously not independent.
Asia Speakers. Closer to independent, I guess, but all it says is that he's the president of an organization. It's not even a full sentence, it's Mr. Abbott saying "I was on a four-person panel with Mr. Sharkey (president of the NZ organization), Mr. Goss, and Mr. Dous."
the ABA. Again, closer to independent, but it's just his name in a list of 37 volunteer judges.
his Amazon page. Not independent.
you might think the NZ companies register is independent - but who do you think supplies the information to them? And even so, all it says is "this organization exists; its officials include Mr. Sharkey".

Total number of independent reliable sources: 0. DS (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Գարիկ Ավագյան, you could now file a request at WP:DRV to ask to have the article restored. It appears to me that DF67's deletion of the page was essentially out of process. The deletion was not based on a PROD tag or an outcome of an AfD, and it appears to have been some form of WP:CSD deletion. The deletion summary reads no, I'm sorry. Those sources don't count as independent, which I take most likely to be an implicit invokation of WP:A7 (although the deletion summary really needed to indicate this fact more clearly). However, for overcoming the WP:A7 bar an article does not need to establish notability, but merely to provide a plausible indication of notability (even if the sources used are not independent), which is a much lower threshhold. E.g. being president of a significant national professional organization, IMO, already provides a credible indication of notability. So there is a good chance that the deletion would be overturned if you file a request at DRV. However, keep in mind that the article can still be listed for AfD ater that, and there the availability of independent sources and the depth of coverage they provide would certainly come into play. Nsk92 (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bearing in mind that there is a difference between "national professional organization" and "significant national professional organization", you are welcome to apply to have the article restored via DRV. Iff you succeed in this, I will give you one additional week (after creating a blatantly inadequate article on November 22, you tinkered with it until December 1, at which point its inadequacy was less blatant but still definitive... and then did nothing whatsoever; then on December 27, I deleted it) to locate actual independent sources for Mr. Sharkey; if you are not able to do so, I will take the article to AfD, where I fully anticipate it will again be deleted. A public record will remain of why Mr. Sharkey does not meet notability criteria; this will continue until, in the fullness of time, Mr. Sharkey writes in to request that it be blanked as a courtesy. You can make things go more easily if you first locate independent sources as to Mr. Sharkey's notability; I do not expect that such sources exist, but I am willing to be surprised. DS (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DragonflySixtyseven, Thank you very much for explanation. Anyway, you could move the article to "Draft:Glen Sharkey" until I find the necessary sources. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk)

Sorry, forgot to check for your answer. I see you remade the draft already; if there's anything from the deleted content you need, just let me know. DS (talk) 23:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linguix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linguix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linguix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 01:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello Գարիկ Ավագյան. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Գարիկ Ավագյան. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Գարիկ Ավագյան|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bilby (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for such useful information! No, I don't charge anything for my articles. If I am not mistaken, it is prohibited in Wikipedia. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk)

The paid contributor template

Can you please fix the paid contributor template on your user page? You pasted {{paid|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. The two instances of "InsertName" need to be replaced by the actual employer and client. Largoplazo (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Գարիկ Ավագյան, I see you have disclosed your paid editing status on your userpage, but you missed to disclosed link(s) to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. Please do so before making any further edit per WP:PAID to comply with full disclosure guidelines. Thank you. GSS ^💬 18:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you also list the other articles for which you have been paid or were otherwise hired to edit. - Bilby (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help! Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 19:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Գարիկ Ավագյան, as per your Upwork profile you were hired to create two articles last month so, can you please disclose their titles? GSS ^💬 09:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote on my user page: Draft:Glen Sharkey and Draft:David Record Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 10:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Armenian Sketches concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Armenian Sketches, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Record (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Record and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Record, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 08:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glen Sharkey (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glen Sharkey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glen Sharkey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 17:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Armenian Sketches

Hello, Գարիկ Ավագյան. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Armenian Sketches".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 01:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]