User talk:Аса аибрикчиев

November 2017

Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I noticed that in this edit to Secure Digital, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 05:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Secure Digital. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 05:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Аса аибрикчиев (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I removed vandalism for Turkish terrorist

Decline reason:

talk page access revoked. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  09:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Iliev, PSS 9, Kerberizer, Luchesar, Spiritia, and Nk: Тези работят за BREN. Аса аибрикчиев (talk) 05:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal to the Unblock Ticket Request System or the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  09:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]