User talk:Χ/Archive 2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Χ. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 2010 | Archive 2011 | Archive 2012 | Archive 2013 | Archive 2014 | Archive 2015 | → | Archive 2020 |
Orphaned non-free media (File:CPR Election Symbol.png)
Thanks for uploading File:CPR Election Symbol.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Standardisation of Tunisian Arabic
Hello Abjiklam,
I am contacting you concerning the deletion of the Standardisation subsection in Tunisian Arabic. The mentioned reference could be as a matter of fact considered original research, however the whole concept of the Tunisian language / dialect could be considered as such as well. No official recognition exists for the language as most political efforts simply regard the language as Arabic, and the Standardisation attempts are within the same vein of the Egyptian ones, no official recognition of Egyptian as a language per se, yet it managed to get a language section on Wikipedia. The text of the subsection was not assertive but suggestive about the nature of the issue. Furthermore, you have deleted the part where Tamazight is added next to Berber. I believe it is important to write the word Amazigh instead of or at least next to, Berber when describing persons, and Tamazight when describing the language, as many ethnic Imazighen consider the word to be offensive. Most references I'm aware of on this issue are in French, here's a link [1] in English if you may be interested.
Best regards
E3 (talk) 11:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi E3,
- There's an established consensus on Wikipedia (though I could not tell you where it comes from) that the different varieties of Arabic should not be considered neither dialects nor separate languages until reliable sources assert so. However there have been publications on Tunisian Arabic and that is why it can have an article without it being considered original research. On the other hand, the standardization you introduced to the article seems to be the work of an individual or a group of people that has not yet achieved sufficient recognition to have its place in an encyclopedia. I understand you did not add this information in a authoritative manner, but it still counts as OR until various sources mention that it is in fact used significantly.
- As for the Egyptian Arabic, I think the reason it was accepted is because there are enough books that have been published in it. So no OR there.
- Now on the issue of Berber / Tamazight, that will have to be taken to its designated article Berber languages. As it is now, I consider Tamazight to be the name of Berber in the Berber languages. We wouldn't write "French / Français" for example. Maybe you can push for a move of Berber language to Tamazight? If that reaches consensus then I will no longer object to writing Tamazight instead of Berber on the Tunisian Arabic article. And do know that I don't wish to offend anyone by having Berber written instead of Tamazight. I just think this issue should be dealt with on a larger scale if it is to addressed.
- Best,
- Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 11:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Abjiklam,
- Thank you for your concise reply, I have taken your points into account. I would just like to add a small point concerning the Tamazight issue. It is naturally understood that writing "French / Français" or "German / Deutsch" would not make any sense, but the issue is somehow closer to writing "German / Heinie" or "German / Kraut". The term "Berber" was allegedly coined by Romans after the Third Punic War either because inhabitants of North Africa were assimilated to Barbarians or because the speech patterns of Tamazight sounded for some reason similar to "Br br br br", and was later picked up by the different political factions dominating the region. It may still be used as a derogatory term by Arabs as well until today,here's one example [2] if you may be interested. I will try to bring these facts to the talk page of Berber languages and see the outcome.
- Best regards
- E3 (talk) 12:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Tunisian presidents
Hello Abjiklam,
please see Talk:List of Presidents of Tunisia for reasoning of my edit/revert. Thank you.
Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)