User talk:Σ/Archive/2013/June

Prince Sexuality

Just because you have not heard of or know anyone who is of the Prince Sexuality does not mean it dose not exist please remove your proposal for deletion as it is not warranted. It may not be in an encyclopedia yet, but it is just a matter of time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paullyc85 (talk • contribs) 05:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

should be considered in the encyclopedia and recognized as a known practiced type of sexuality what do you have against that? just cause you have never heard of it or know no one is is currently practicing this life-style dose not mean it dose not exist nor should not be allowed on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paullyc85 (talk • contribs) 05:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

If it ever does become widely recognised, then it can have an article on Wikipedia. We don't have articles on things that aren't important. See WP:NOTE for details, and there are links on that page that have more information, too. →Σσς. (Sigma) 07:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

About the deletion of my page

Dear Sir,

I have totally no idea about why you delete my page. After read the whole page of Evian, I found out that Evian is even more promotional than my page. Please give me a good explain about the deletion. Please review carefully about my page and Evian's and you will found out there isn't too much difference.

If you tell me Evian can be showed in the Wikipedia because it is a big brand name or it pay a fortune to Wikipedia, then I have nothing to say and I will not bother Wikipedia anymore.

Thank you!!!

William — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsa345asd (talk • contribs) 03:19, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

I am not in a position to judge whether or not Evian is written like an advertisement, but I can say that the fact that other similar articles exist is not a valid justification for another one to be created. →Σσς. (Sigma) 09:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

• The article was not deleted by Σ , it was deleted by admin Jimfbleak after taking into consideration all the issues listed by Σ. Having reviewed the deleted material, I concur with Jimfbleak that the deletion was appropriate. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Please Don't Delete Talia Castellano's Wikipedia Article!!

I already said, but this girl is amazing and deserves to be noticed. She has over a million fans that would agree. Also, I include useful websites to find LOTS of information about you. Lastly, I am adding birth date, PO Box, Hometown, and so much more very so. Thank you Σ,

~Just That Nerd  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just That Nerd (talk • contribs) 23:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC) 

(talk page stalker) It's fine to say that she's amazing, but why exactly? Anyone can claim that someone else or themselves are amazing, but on Wikipedia, we need more than just that. We need the concrete reasons why you consider her notable enough to be included in the encyclopedia - "she's amazing" is inadequate. These reasons must be backed up by multiple independent reliable sources, especially since she is a living person. If you have questions on how to do that, feel free to ask me or Σ.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jerusalem

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jerusalem. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

J-20 is being vandalized again.

Hello, please lock J-20 page again. It is being vandalized again by trolls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.71.58.38 (talk) 00:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, and cannot protect pages. →Σσς. (Sigma) 18:16, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Simulator for Arduino

Hi, I saw the Simulator for Arduino page has been deleted. Would it be possible to restore the text and move this to articles so I can keep working on it and then set it up for approval. We spent a some time writing this text, and there are many people using the Simulator for Arduino program (~20k users growing by 1k/month). The idea behind this page is to provide information about the Simulator including the history, features, help, future plans and so on. We decided when we reached 10k users that the Simulator needs a Wiki page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virtronics (talk • contribs) 00:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

GorillaWarfare (talk · contribs) has emailed you the text. →Σσς. (Sigma) 02:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)