User talk:Λεξικόφιλος

About Vattenfall and arguments

Sorry to put that in you're front of you're site. No mean to make any hard feelings. Still I think you should answer my arguement instead of just delete changes. About spelling I accept what you have written and that is no big issue to me. The issue is NPOV and more or less bold statements about pseudo-solutions by organizations who are clearly biased and have a clear political agenda. Therefor I dont say that CCS is a good solution but if you read the article about CCS on Wikipedia you see no trace of such statements there. You can look that up in other encylopedia's or science magazines. There are some who thinks its a bad idea and there are some who thinks its a good idea. But no proofs are presented that CCS is a pseudo-solution. --Pwa66 (talk) 01:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Strategic management

You added a copyvio notice to Strategic management a few days ago that broke the page. I've removed the notice to get the article to display properly. Could you please follow up with the copyright problem, it isn't overlooked? I'm not sure what needs to be done and don't have the time to look into it. --Ronz (talk) 18:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I've restored this again. Unless you feel like participating in the discussion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 February 17 where I showed in detail six days ago why this is not a copyright violation, I see no reason to leave that template in place. Kuru (talk) 12:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Haiti

Please see Talk:Politics_of_Haiti#Politics_vs_Elections. I agree that Politics of Haiti needs a lot of work. That would not include reverting it to include Government of Haiti. "Government" is quite different from "Politics." Student7 (talk) 14:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)