User talk:Δ/20100801
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Δ. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Arbitration motion regarding User:Δ
Per a motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:
The Arbitration Committee provisions for the unbanning of Betacommand are amended as follows: Betacommand (talk · contribs), now editing as Δ (talk · contribs), is authorized to operate a single secondary account, Δbot (talk · contribs), only to perform automated tasks directly related to the clerking of sockpuppet investigations only as specified and authorized by the Bot Approvals Group. Any other use of the bot, broadly interpreted, must be specifically authorized in advance by BAG and endorsed by ArbCom.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tiptoety talk 07:05, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
- News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports
- In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed
- WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
Arbitration Enforcement Request notification
Please be aware that I have filed an Arbitration Enforcement Request concerning you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#.CE.94. 67.80.250.138 (talk) 08:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Just a question about that "wikitext clenaup tool" you mentioned: if I'm not mistaken, according to your unban conditions, you are still "prohibited from operating bots or running automated scripts of whatever nature", right? Was that also lifted, or do you feel that tool doesn't come under the restriction? It would be nice if you could briefly clarify this for me. Thanks, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- its not automated, and its designed to be used alongside normal editing (in conjunction with another edit) what it will do when done is generic minor text cleanup (and then load that data into the web browser for review and further modifications) So according to my restrictions its not applicable, tools:~dispenser/view/Reflinks is where I got the original idea from. Since this is not automated its not prohibited. ΔT The only constant 12:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, fine with me. Thanks for the explanation. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
ANI notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --John Nagle (talk) 18:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The IP asked a question at the talk page on July 31, maybe you might want to respond and explain, rather than blind reverting. –xenotalk 18:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- I missed that, I had left notes on several of its (random and constantly changing) talk pages. ΔT The only constant 19:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Your patrol through Hell's_Kitchen_(U.S.)
While I understand that you have a previous history with editing in Wikipedia, I would like to understand some of your reasoning on the whitespace additions and deletions. Some of the changes I will agree with in terms of updating the link titles, but I do not understand how changing the br tags to include a space between the r and the slash is improving the article. I will watch your talk page for the duration of this discussion. Hasteur (talk) 04:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- <br /> is the proper XHTML and standardizing wikitext with what it implements (even thought mediawiki uses Tidy to prevent any actually breakage) it makes it easier to work with for those who are familiar with the markup. Since I was already cleaning up the wikitext (link titles) I went ahead and standardized the markup. ΔT The only constant 04:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Undocumented changes to User:Δ/monobook.js
You have made numerous unexplained changes to this file, which can be understood as giving you the ability to do automated edits. You are under the most stringent restrictions concerning both automated edits & running bots. Until you explain in satisfactory detail what these changes do I have reverted these edits & protected this page. It is not my responsibility to understand the code, but it is yours to document it. -- llywrch (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'm curious as to where in all of Δ's editing restrictions there's a requirement that he document javascript code he creates? --Hammersoft (talk) 22:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- As I noted on Llywrch's talk page, the restriction on automated edits expired 11 July 2010. No such restriction exists. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Llywrch closed down the discussion on his talk page. Discussion is now happening at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Betacommand#New_unauthorized_bot-like_activity. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, the community restriction on automated edits is still in effect, except as modified by ArbComm. However, consensus (mostly from people who haven't looked at the code) seems to be that most of the changes are only for simplification of single edits, so wouldn't be in violation. On the gripping hand, his restoration seems to have changed the character "Δ" in the .js file to some other character, which is probably a mistake. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:54, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
your Admin page
I have moved it to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Δ and created redirects. Off2riorob (talk) 19:51, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Speedy deletion declined: User:RitaSimonian/DATA The Global Fund prefix:Talk:U2/
Hello Δ. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:RitaSimonian/DATA The Global Fund prefix:Talk:U2/, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Page in userspace: may be notes by editor to herself to write or improve an article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
cat I just added here
I hope you don't mind, it's not meant to be a scarlet letter or anything, just a tool for tracking what happens to users after they succeed in getting a ban removed. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:19, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- I do mind, and have removed it. ΔT The only constant 22:03, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Rename at eswikibooks
Done. Left some notes there too. Regards, --Dferg (talk) 10:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
You may be interested
Category:Articles with improper non-free content (lists). Still a lot more to add to this yet ... Black Kite (t) (c) 01:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Bots
Where do you keep information about your bot and its duties? :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Just the BRFA's. ΔT The only constant 17:40, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?