User talk:İslamIsTheOnlyTruth

Welcome!

Hello, İslamIsTheOnlyTruth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Lil Jon did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 16:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, the edit I made has been confirmed all over social media and has no reason to go against wokipedia's verifiability policy İslamIsTheOnlyTruth (talk) 16:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really get the relevance of your "wokipedia" joke, but "it's all over social media" is not good enough. Reliable sources, please. Drmies (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, that was I typo, I am sure you could have worded that response a bit more professionally, a belief doesn't require evidennce to prove it is something that is ackniwledge by everyone, I can add a citation of 3 different youtube videos if you like, but wether you may like it or not it has been confirmed and you can search it up on the news youself as you wish, İslamIsTheOnlyTruth (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alids, you may be blocked from editing. 2003 LN 6 04:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, if I am mistaken I was fixing a mistake, not vandalising, there was incorrect information İslamIsTheOnlyTruth (talk) 04:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@İslamIsTheOnlyTruth: Which "incorrect information" was there in the article? Your diff shows that you added "(Peace Be Upon Him)" in the article, while you did not remove any incorrect information or attempt to correct it. In addition, this edit on this article may be considered conflict of interest, which is not allowed per policy. 2003 LN 6 15:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abubakr Shak (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abubakr Shak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, İslamIsTheOnlyTruth! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abubakr Shak (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abubakr Shak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]