User talk:ßlaïsi Furstqurzel

Nomination of Sanders-Trump dream ticket for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanders-Trump dream ticket is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanders-Trump dream ticket until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cahk (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, ßlaïsi Furstqurzel, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! ßlaïsi Furstqurzel, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer chai latte over actual tea. Sorry. --ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 19:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ‑ iridescent 20:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked without warning, and I have not been notified about what 'personal attacks' I have made. Please enlighten me. ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 20:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So you have no idea? The harassment was here. Good block. Bishonen | talk 20:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That edit was an innocent mistake, I was preparing to use that word (which is scientific, not racist) in a article and I got confused and used it on some editors home page. ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sure you meant to use "bloody awful" in an article as well? Obvious troll is obvious. Talk page access revoked. Huon (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.