User talk:R000t: Difference between revisions
Calabe1992 (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by Mallorca23 (talk) to last revision by R000t (HG) |
Mallorca23 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Thanks again for your help, --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small> D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 11:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks again for your help, --[[User:Roger Davies|<font color="maroon">'''R<small>OGER</small> D<small>AVIES'''</small></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Roger Davies|'''talk''']]</sup> 11:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Response to Reward Board (Furry Articles) == |
|||
For the [[furcadia]] article, I ran through and fixed some last minute, minor (but oh, so important) problems, and nominated it for Good Quality Article. I will continue to keep you updated on its progress. Have a nice day! |
|||
[[User:Vistro|Vistro]] ([[User talk:Vistro|talk]]) 00:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:That's good news; however be aware that you will probably not get much of the credit for raising the article to good article status, as [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Furcadia&diff=184150501&oldid=183649651 the changes you made] do not appear to be numerous or significant. The actual act of nomination is not part of the reward - it is the raising of the article itself to the required standard that counts. If subsequent issues are raised by the GA reviewers and you take the action to fix them, that may be another matter. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 01:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for your help on [[Furcadia]], but I don't think it will get a GA status yet, as most of the information in it is still unsourced. -[[User:Kotra|kotra]] ([[User talk:Kotra|talk]]) 00:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Alpha Zeta Omega]] == |
== [[Alpha Zeta Omega]] == |
Revision as of 14:10, 19 October 2011
This is R000t's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
Welcome to my talk page. If you have a question about Wikipedia, or any of it's Policies, procedures, and guidelines, feel free to ask a question below. I will get back to you as soon as possible. Once I have contacted you on your talk page initially, I will continue the conversation on my page. This keeps everything in order. Have a nice day! Vistro 20:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Your RfA
Hi! I think I ought to advise you that it was far too early to request Adminship. It is highly unlikely that it will succeed. If you wish to keep it open, so that you might learn what you need to do to make the next one more likely to gain support, then do so - but there is no shame in closing it yourself per WP:SNOW (in fact, taking the decision yourself may appear better in a future application). Whatever you decide, don't be discouraged! Enthusiasm for the job is a key quality, but it is likely that people will want more edits so that they can make a decent judgement. Cheers. LessHeard vanU 00:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I've closed your RfA.
I am truly sorry, but it is far too early for you to be an admin. For example, I made my first few edits in February, however, I am not an admin myself. Once again, I am very sorry, but your RfA had no chance of succeeding. JONATHAN Go green! 00:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
You marked the article Elite Exbanded Timeline patrolled, but there were still many problems on it. I have tagged the article so that it may receive the attention it needs. If you are unsure about whether an article still may need improvement or tagging, or merely want a second opinion on it, please do not mark it patrolled. Thank you. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks and Happy New Year
Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for all your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.
Military history service award | ||
For tagging and assessing 250 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES talk 11:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.
Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be good to have your feedback/comments on the drive at the Tag & Assess workshop
Thanks again for your help, --ROGER DAVIES talk 11:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted this article to one that doesn't include a huge copy-paste, but I admit the article doesn't really assert notability. Feel free to take it to AfD. J Milburn (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
New! BCAD drive from Milhist
Can I invite you to particpate in our new assessment drive? It's strictly for experienced editors and has a degree of friendly competition built-in. It involves re-evaluating around 3500 Milhist B-Class articles to ensure they match our new criteria. As ever, we're offering a range of awards as our way of expressing our thanks. The drive doesn't start until 18:00 (UTC) on March 10 but you can sign up in advance here. It would be great if you can spare the time, --ROGER DAVIES talk 05:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
-
One Stripe (200 articles) -
Two Stripes (400 articles) -
Three Stripes (600 articles) -
Chevrons (1000 articles) -
Golden Wiki First place
-
Request
Hello, Vistro! This is a little bit personal favor I ask of you. Would you please check Battle of Canusium for grammar. At least for the most "deplorable" errors. That would help me much to improve my English.--Dobrin (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Your remarks are useful.--Dobrin (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
News! Tag & Assess 2008 is coming ...
Milhist's new drive – Tag & Assess 2008 – goes live on April 25 and you are cordially invited to participate. This time, the task is housekeeping. As ever, there are awards galore, plus there's a bit of friendly competition built-in, with a race for bronze, silver and gold wikis! You can sign up, in advance, here. I look forward to seeing you on the drive page! All the best, --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:24, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
-
One Stripe (200 articles) -
Two Stripes (400 articles) -
Three Stripes (600 articles) -
Tireless Contributor Barnstar (1000 articles) -
Chevrons (2000 articles) -
Working Man's Barnstar (3000 articles) -
Barnstar of Diligence (4000 articles) -
Third place overall -
Second place overall -
First place overall
-
Formatting help
I'm the primarily author of Weather beacon. When I started the article, I thought that there would be only a few to list. The total list of the number of weather beacons is around seventy. I didn't like the list because I thought it was sloppy and the footnotes unwieldy. So I began putting the information in a table in my sandbox: User:SDC/sandbox#wb. Now the table seems unwieldy. Can you give me an extra pair of eyes? I'm not sure which direction to go in. SDC (talk) 23:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Democratic Kampuchea
Please be more careful in the future as your needless changes to the infobox on Democratic Kampuchea completely broke it. --Cybercobra (talk) 04:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I did! Check your facts... stupid bot Vistro (talk) 04:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
It indicates its notability with independant sources. Take it to AfD if you want. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 06:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Re lowercase with template attributes and interwiki links
Hi Vistro! Your recent pipe-linking at Walter Chrysler to bypass the redirects was good. The capitalizing of template attributes actually breaks the functionality, so I restored lowercase. With the interwiki links, lowercase is standard. I'm not posting here to bust your chops, just to let you know why I restored the lowercase in those spots. Cheers, — ¾-10 17:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Re Crataegus crus-galli page
Hi Vistro. Just to let you know that your latest change to the Taxobox on the Crataegus crus-galli page has meant that the Taxobox won't display. I can't figure it out (except that capitalizing the components seems to be part of the problem). Nadiatalent (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
AdminHelp
I read an article in the news about how users that have edited to the Barack Obama article, points how he refuses to publicly show his birth certificate, and his affiliation with Ayers, have been banned repeatedly. They have even cited thier sources. What rule are these edits breaking? We can't just favor one side, the entire article is full of praise, certainly we need to allow edits that don't praise him, as well.
I just needed an admin's opinion on this. I try to tell people that Wikipedia isn't just a big joke, but it's hard for me to say that when these things come up.
- You can't get "banned" just for adding that kind of information. I haven't found any proof that anyone's gotten blocked for editing the president's article. More than likely they're either adding the information without reliable sources (like, they're citing to a blog or something) or they're violating WP:3RR. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, 3RR/edit war and WP:FRINGE just as I suspected. Political articles are always tricky. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Nintendo task force membership update
I am currently gauging the active membership of the Nintendo task force. I have split the members list into an "active list" and an "inactive list" and have moved all members (except myself) to the "inactive list". To confirm that you're still an active participant in the task force, please go to the membership list at WP:NIN and simply move your name from the "inactive list" back onto the "active list". If you no longer wish to be a member, simply remove your name from the list. After two weeks (around 23 March 2009), I will remove all names on the inactive list. Thank you, and hope you're still interested, MuZemike 20:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Your edits to User:Jimbo Wales
I rollbacked the above edits since they are vandalism - you are changing what Jimbo says. The "you may edit this page" comment is directed at making useful additions, and not what you did. Since you are a long time contributor I shall not be making a formal warning, but I would strongly urge you not to do it again. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from 1952–1953 United States network television schedule (weekday)
Hello Vistro, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to 1952–1953 United States network television schedule (weekday) has been removed. It was removed by DGG with the following edit summary '(one of a series-- not appropriate to delete this one by itself without discussion.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with DGG before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
Sathya Sai Baba Sandbox
Hi Vistro We tried this as good idea to get everybody working on changes together in the article but it didn't really work out so I wouldn't spend any time on it.Sbs108 (talk) 21:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Non Free Images in you User Space
Hey there Vistro, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Vistro/Stuck In Neutral. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
R000t (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was told that if I logged on I would still be able to edit. Erm... please help?
Decline reason:
Clearing an autoblock
Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:
- If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache. - Try to edit the Sandbox.
- If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
- Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.
If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Q T C 05:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- R000t (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 24.1.197.58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Decline reason: After checking with the blocking admin, who said he's 80% sure you're the user who vandalized, I looked at your contributions and the IP's. I discovered that you have no activity since November 15th prior to today; that about an hour after the block, someone at the IP address made it clear they have a previous account; within an hour after that you make your first unblock request. This appears to be a reason to think that you are the person against who the block is intended. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:09, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Consulting with blocking admin. He probably meant a soft block, which wouldn't affect you while you're logged in, but I think I should check with him, just in case there's a reason for it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:49, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor
As a previous volunteer at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor I though you might like to know there is a new set available for work at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor/20100826. Hope to see you there. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Otto Binnig
I am confused as to the tags added to this article. I as the major contributor do not have a connection to Otto Binnig. As for the notability I believe that as a recipient of the Knight's Cross, which was one of Germany's highest war time honours should be good enough to not have it deleted. DocYako (talk) 01:14 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Bro I wish I could reply to you! But you didn't sign with a four ~ marks! Can you do that, and I can reply to you? Thanks! Vistro (talk) 00:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh and as I recall, I removed it after I read some of the sources. Let me check again, though. Vistro (talk) 00:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Prod on Erskine Thomason
I'm removing the prod because, under WP:MLB/N, it states that to be notable, a player must
"Have appeared in at least one game in any one of the following active major leagues: Major League Baseball, Nippon Professional Baseball, Korea Baseball Organization, Chinese Professional Baseball League or any other top-level national league (active or defunct)"
Which Erskine Thomason has, no matter how unnotable he may be.
Best, Battleaxe9872 Talk 01:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- M'kay. I was wondering about that one. Vistro (talk) 01:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Serenata for Orchestra (Piston)
Hello Vistro. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Serenata for Orchestra (Piston), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thx bro Vistro (talk) 02:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
No personal attacks
ever. You will be blocked. Stop. Thank you. ℳono feedback 04:04, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Stop!
You don't seem to be very "popular" here. And quit spaming my page just because your board! --Gertie1999 (talk) 16:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Gertie1999 You may get banned!
- Wikipedia is not a popularity contest. You won't see all of my "good" achievements listed on this page, only the occasional error I make. Have a nice day! Vistro (talk) 16:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
please just leave me alone on my user page and talk page--Gertie1999 (talk) 16:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Gertie1999 but you do have a point
- I'm very sorry for your inconvenience. It's nothing personal, I assure you. Vistro (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Ok sorry for causing you trouble. I'm having a hard time on here to look at all the articles of mine that got removed and all my warnings --Gertie1999 (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Gertie1999
Heh. We reverted at the same time; I stopped to make sure it didn't happen again. :-) ~dee 20:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Editor assistance list
Hello. Since your account has been inactive for some time, it has been removed from Wikipedia:Editor assistance/list. There is an explanation at Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list#Problem with inactive accounts on the list. You are, of course, welcome to re-add yourself to the list if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Towson University
I just wanted you to know I think we got our signals crossed and you revert a revert of mine that ended up re-adding a vandal edit. I reverted the revert of my revert (if that makes sense) to remove the vandal edit. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 17:47, 29 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Jncraton (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
Hi R000t. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 18:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Hello r000t! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 04:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC) |
hi dear pal
is this sentence correct? "United States allegation of Iran plot to assassination of saudi arabia ambassador"
thanksAlborzagros (talk) 05:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alborzagros (talk • contribs)
Strain (surname)
You have complained that my edit to Strain (surname) was unconstructive. If you have another look you will see that I reverted many paragraphs of text added without any references or support of any kind. It looks just like original research and I reverted it as such. Velella Velella Talk 08:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I assumed a massive removal of content was unwanted. I truly apologize. I've added you to my software's various ignore lists so I don't accidentally revert your work. Thanks for letting me know! I am r000t (talk) 13:05, 19 October 2011 (UTC)