User talk:Qwertyus/archive5: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:51, 24 August 2014

Dawoodi Bohras

We may have gotten on wrong foot . you seem tobe experienced editor. your intention of getting involved might be in good faith. Mine is same. trust we can colloborate positivly.Rukn950 (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To get you aquainted with Dawoodi Bohra I would refer you complete non bais source , Mr Jonah Blank [1]

you can download his book from here [2]

I'd actually been reading bits of that book on GBooks. Your link looks like a copyvio, are you sure it's legit? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about that link but that book is available on Google BooksRukn950 (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Research Unix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Userland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hard links to directories in OS X

(Just FYI.) The ability to make hard links to directories was added to OS X to support a form of de-duplication for Time Machine - Time Machine creates, on the backup volume, a duplicate directory hierarchy, giving the state of the file system at the time the backup was done, and, if a file or directory didn't change between two backups on the backup volume, they're hard-linked together, so there's only one copy. A "change" to a directory includes changes to anything underneath it, e.g. if foo/bar changed, so did foo.

(It would have been nice had Apple decided to go with ZFS, as I think the version of ZFS available at the time did de-duplication, so they wouldn't have had to use a hack involving hard links to directories - just use ZFS with de-duplication on backup volumes.) Guy Harris (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Deduplication feature in ZFS looks great but it comes with significant penalties, as between 1 and 5 GB of RAM is required for every TB of storage for storing and managing deduplication tables. Thus, hard links are a much more efficient solution for deduplicating (compressed) backup files. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 17:52, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OER inquiry

Hi Qwertyus, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton C shell

Following up on your remark that you found it fun to learn about this shell, I encourage you (if it's of interest) to send mail to the author (contact info is on the site), mention you edit on Wikipedia and ask for a free copy to help you review the article. Use a throwaway email address if you'd like to preserve your anonymity. These requests never get turned down and you're not promising to do anything. Msnicki (talk) 17:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Qwertyus. You have new messages at Nyashinski's talk page.
Message added 05:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nyashinski (talk) 05:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

C dynamic memory allocation

I didn't understand this edit. There's a sentence fragment that left an incomplete thought. So I'm not quite sure where you were going in this section and I can't say if WP:OR might be a concern. But you may need to think about sources. Msnicki (talk) 15:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter diplomacy

Hi, Qwertyus.

I'm not sure how best to address your concern with the Twitter diplomacy page; it's my first article.

I created the Twitter diplomacy page. I'm a master's student in Russia, and I chose this topic to satisfy a requirement for one of my courses. It's not an ad; I have no affiliation with Twiplomacy nor with anyone listed in the article.

The article uses Twiplomacy's numbers only to highlight the main point of the article, which is that diplomats and foreign publics are getting closer thanks to Twitter. Why did you not highlight this article as an ad for Twitter?

The page is much more robust than those for digital diplomacy and Facebook diplomacy, two pages that barely qualify as articles. If the references to Twiplomacy are so contentious, some of them can be removed. I'm not sure why deletion of the entire page or "blowing it up and starting over" is your proposed solution.

Thanks. Dave — Preceding unsigned comment added by D.a.kelm (talk • contribs) 17:22, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because I feel the entire article hinges on that website's research. The way it's presented (first assert that Twitter is very important by WP:OR, then extensively cite one piece of research from a commercial party) looks suspiciously similar to the kind of spam that many companies dump on Wikipedia.

(You're right that the other two pages are of very low quality.) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:15, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014 disambig contest: let's do it again!

Greetings fellow disambiguator! Remember back in February when we made history by clearing the board for the first time ever, for the monthly disambiguation contest? Let's do it again in May! I personally will be aiming to lead the board next month, but for anyone who thinks they can put in a better effort, I will give a $10 Amazon gift card to any editor who scores more disambiguation points in May. Also, I will be setting up a one-day contest later in the month, and will try to set up more prizes and other ways to make this a fun and productive month. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

edits to Armadillo (C++ library)

As requested, I've added a further reference/source for the Armadillo (C++ library). The reference is published in a peer reviewed scientific journal. Apologies for seemingly overwriting your edits -- no warring was intended, but simply corrections and clarifications.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtfjbl (talk • contribs) 10:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An extra source is cool. But it doesn't solve your apparent use of the page as ad space. The favorable comparison to uBLAS, for example, should be cited from a third-party source. I made this very clear in my edit summaries, and your "clarifications" include restoration of policy-violating material QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. I've rephrased the relation to uBLAS. Is it ok ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtfjbl (talk • contribs) 10:10, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwertyus. You have new messages at StephenBuxton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stephen! ^Coming... 11:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Starwarsgeek's comment

Hi why did you get rid of my edits on Childbirth, and star wars episode lll revenge of the sith — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwarsgeek894 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the edit summaries? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent revert

I know fixing these sorts of things are annoying when patrolling recent changes, but it's better to correctly add the {{cn}} template on behalf of the user than revert a valid attempt to challenge unsourced material. — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

However to be fair, with articles on movies/novels we usually don't source the plot summary as it's assumed to be from the primary source... — MusikAnimal ^talk 22:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madaline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sigmoid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle

Hi Qwertyus (goodness, you really did choose a confusing username! I was about to post this to Marcus). Not sure if you saw (I just noticed your post at WT:TW being archived), but the bug you reported about CSD notification wikilinking was fixed some time ago [3]. Thanks for the report. — This, that and the other (talk) 10:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks This, that and the other! Btw., I had this username for almost four years when the Marcus Qwertyus account was created :) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK. I guess I've been more involved in areas where Marcus is active, and have never come across you before! — This, that and the other (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've started the review at Talk:Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria/GA1--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, DoABitOfGood.com, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - Mr X 22:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Homeland Security Research edit

Hi, thank you for contributing to the Homeland Security Research edit. I am an officer in the company, see www.hsrc.biz. The information you reverted to is incorrect! The company is not part of the DHS. It is a private, not a public organization. It is a critical error!! Our potential clients are misled by the wikipedia article. You can take out whatever marketing blurb you deem inappropriate. However, please do not revert to the previous version. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsrc1234 (talk • contribs) 08:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving this discussion to Talk:Homeland Security Market Research#Part of US Gov't or not?. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quicksort Article changes

This is with reference to the wikipedia quicksort article : [4]. I did some minor changes which you reverted back. I am a new user so please help me out. The problem that I wanted to resolve was that in even 120% resolution, the code was overflowing towards the right into the image. I wanted to correct that so I introduced the 'pre' tag for the code with auto scrolling enabled. I can't understand how it is breaking the existing code though.

Also, while using the 'pre' tag, if I want to bold the font then what should I do, because the normal ' ' ' are not working and instead show up in the rendered version of the page.

Hope you can give me some pointers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshitm26 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The ''' showing up is exactly why I reverted your edit. I'm not sure what to do about this, but one option is to stop manually putting bold and italic in pseudocode; I prefer using <source lang="pascal"> and use some Pascal conventions. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Welcome!

Thank you, Qwertyus (your name is quite a low complexity art). I have been on Wikipedia for some years but mainly worked on the Vietnamese version. Are you an administrator here? ngocminh.oss (talk) 13:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, just a regular editor. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you :-) ngocminh.oss (talk) 15:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feature hashing

Hi Qwertyus, there's a bug somewhere breaking the page, see Talk:Feature hashing. Cheers Widefox; talk 23:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Hart

I'm glad you're satisfied with the references about the line lengths. I was a bit surprised that thousands of lines of equal length by Hart in the Gutenberg mail archives were not convincing enough as evidence. ;-) YewBowman (talk) 17:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

YewBowman, I'm trying to abide by WP:PRIMARY here, specifically "All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source." No number of examples of Hart's writing suffices to establish the statements made about this style, as it could be an artifact of the specific examples cited, or a style adhered to by some group that he belonged to, rather than the man himself. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:42, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation, Qwertyus, and for pointing to WP:PRIMARY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YewBowman (talk • contribs) 19:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bias variance dilemma

You're welcome, glad you found it as interesting as I did ! I'd not heard of this rule before reading Gigerenzer's latest book "Risk Savvy", which has just come out. Highly recommended. Robma (talk) 13:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

INSEAD

You seem to revert my edits. Care to explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by האורים והתומים (talk • contribs) 09:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not discussing that here, head over to Malicious, unjustified removals or defamations against INSEAD. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria

The article Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thunderbirds Are Go!

Just a heads up. I removed your prod at this article because I think a fair argument could be made that it satisfies the GNG. I agree with you that it's probably too soon, but I was surprised by the amount of coverage that I found once I did a few Google searches. The original article gave absolutely no indication of notability, and I think that I've added enough sources that it makes at least a credible claim now. I have no problem if you want to start a merge proposal or bring it to AfD. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not go through AfD. The series will probably either launch or be canceled (*), in which case it's better to already have a stub article than wait for a lesser version to be recreated.

(*) The third option is that it's postponed indefinitely, of course. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:35, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion denied

Qwertyus,

I denied your speedy deletion at The School of Applied Arts. Educational institutions do not qualify under WP:CSDA7. You may nominate for proposed deletion or launch a deletion discussion if you wish. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quicksort

Hi Qwertyus,

I found an error on the Quicksort page so am hoping you can verify the fix and get it changed somehow. I'm new to this so am unfamiliar to the procedure. I see you have made some changes in the past so am hoping you can help me out.

On the page

Original page

Under the C# section

The line

loe.Add(pivot_val);

Should be changed to

resultSet.Add(pivot_val);

loe gets sorted and added to resultSet before that point, but loe is never used again after that. If the pivot_val is added to loe then the pivot_val is lost.

Also, a small speed boost can be had by changing the line

gt.Add(pivot_val);

To

gt.Insert(0, pivot_val);

Since we know that pivot_val is between loe and gt, we can save some sorting time by placing pivot_val at the beginning of gt instead of at the end.

WhiteLeroy (talk) 18:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have an account on Rosettacode and I can't be bothered to make one. That website is unrelated to Wikipedia. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note

You reported Shejiao to AIV, but you didn't even Welcome them to show them the rules, or provide any warnings? That's not kosher. I have blocked, but it's unacceptable to not at least try and guide them the panda ₯’ 09:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot that even such a blatant spammer should get a welcome. As you'll have seen, the only thing the user did was post the same spam to random pages, unrelated to the websites they were pushing.

I'll be more careful next time, but shouldn't you have turned down the request in favor of a level 4im warning? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: React - The Anti-Counterfeiting Network

Hello Qwertyus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of React - The Anti-Counterfeiting Network, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article does "credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". I found a United Nations Economic Commission for Europe mention of its purported founder. Rather promotional, self-serving and sorely neededing a re-name = yes, but WP:A7 = no. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 8 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Founding of Rome page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Base Connect Page Edits

Hey There Qwertyus,

I'm inquiring about the content of the Base Connect wikipedia page. While it contains a significant amount of resource reverences, the page seems to be written with a clear angle that does not offer the public a fair understanding of the organization. Can we discuss the content? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaf651 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss article content at its talk page. There's already been a fair amount of discussion there a few years ago. I've put it on my watchlist. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

National Computerization Agency

I de-speedied this article about a government agency. Bearian (talk) 20:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why? According to WP:CSD#G11, "anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view". QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

O.K., that's fair reason to delete, but I don't see how G11 applies to an article about (a) a government agency, and (b) that's not entirely promotional, that is, that is not a total wreck. Prod it or send it to AfD if you feel strongly about it. That will give others a week to try to stubify it or fix the problems. Bearian (talk) 14:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Machine learning, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mapping and Clustering. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Burhanuddin article

Dear Qwertyus, I think your aim is to have NPOV maintained and I perfectly agree with you and I am first person to honour Wiki rules as I am a big fan of Wiki and I respect and value it all above any media in the world as it is self correcting a sea of information.

I don't think that there should be third person (they are also part and partial of Wiki like us, but we should not give chance to bother them, being true wikipedian) to be involved when there are two editors working for the cause of Wiki.

I understand that I am a DB and it is but natural that I have some inclination toward it, but please make it sure that my intention is never to suppress any true or well published information. As I know, all the inside facts of DB more then you and you are the third neutral party so you can judge where my language is tilting towars one side, and you have all the freedom given by Wiki to make the sentence/information best to NPOV. But incomplete information/ wrong information, which has solution available in media is to be well presented for purpose of general viewer remaining in the limit of Wiki, as there are elements available to make propoganda using Wiki, and we must avoid it at any cost.--Md iet (talk) 03:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope , I am clear in my expression although I am very weak in English. I respect your intentions still I request your full cooperation in the matter.

redundant flow control code because of code that is never reached

Your reversal of my edit of the code example in the lemma Fork (system call) ignores the reason for the change: removal of unneeded flow control; the comments /* NEVER REACHED */ were only added to make it explicit. I rather see you reverse your reversal than that I start a flip flop.

In the code example when a certain condition is met the if block of code ends execution, i.e. no code thereafter is run in that case. For that reason putting the code that is to be run when the condition in *not* met in an else block is superfluous and adds unneeded levels of indenting and so forth. In fact having code in an else block when the if block ends execution is outright bad coding. (BTW. many seasoned libraries offer calls that do some sanity checks on entry, not in a sequence of if .. else if .. and so forth, but just a sequence of simple if blocks that each exits (return) from the call when the sanity check fails).

Besides, the given reason for the reversal, that the never reached comments are redundant because any C programmer understands that exit() ends execution is beside the point. Examples are to be understood a well as possible by non experienced programmers, by people with possibly no knowledge of the semantics of the standard C libs. --Paul Oranje (talk) 12:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The extra level of indentation shows the symmetry of the three cases. In real code, I would in fact put all three cases in a switch with the parent as the default case, but I'm avoiding that to make the code readable to non-C programmers. It's also more robust to change, although I find this a matter of taste (not one of "outright bad coding") and I don't care too much about it. Note that only the -1 case is an error check. The other two cases are parent and child, not error and success.

Your comments are overly verbose and distracting, though, and you won't find such comments in seasoned libraries. Any sane programmer can figure out that exit exits the program. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quicksort and Stack (abstract data type) articles

Hello! Regarding your edit on the Stack (abstract data type) article, just wanted to let you know that I simply didn't have the energy required to dive into the provided content, and I've moved it over to Quicksort article pretty much in a blind manner. However, in my opinion numerous examples from the Stack (abstract data type) article should be simply deleted leaving only one, perhaps what's available in Stack (abstract data type) § Expression evaluation and syntax parsing). All those examples are simply making a complete mess of that article. Thoughts? — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 08:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it didn't really fit in either article because its terminology is different from the rest of Quicksort, and the terminology wasn't explained in the context of Stack (abstract data type) either. I think WP is better off without this example anywhere; it could probably be improved using the reference that was at the bottom of it, but I don't have the time/energy to go after this either and I honestly don't care too much.

Re: trimming the number of examples: I do think backtracking, or maybe just DFS, is an important and easy to explain application of stacks, but you're right that the examples are taking up far too much space. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a note, I'm totally fine with deleting Quicksort as an example there. Moving forward, I'll trim the examples as that has been already proposed in Talk:Stack (abstract data type) § The "Applications" section should be split., and we'll see how that unwinds. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 09:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Branch and bound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Last in, first out. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
435	Floor and ceiling functions (talk)	Add sources
121	Binary classification (talk)	Add sources
701	Predictive analytics (talk)	Add sources
260	Multinomial logistic regression (talk)	Add sources
132	ShowBiz Pizza Place (talk)	Add sources
778	Genetic algorithm (talk)	Add sources
83	Zilog (talk)	Cleanup
1,119	Fast Fourier transform (talk)	Cleanup
19	Bayesian interpretation of regularization (talk)	Cleanup
32	Empirical risk minimization (talk)	Expand
23	HexaDrive (talk)	Expand
531	Bayesian network (talk)	Expand
190	Hill climbing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5,780	Linux (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
855	Binary tree (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
491	Dispersion (optics) (talk)	Merge
190	Bootstrap aggregating (talk)	Merge
3	.loan (talk)	Merge
148	Online machine learning (talk)	Wikify
5	Discourse on Reforming the Government of Florence (talk)	Wikify
27	Cellular neural network (talk)	Wikify
10	H2o (Analytics tool) (talk)	Orphan
5	Lateral computing (talk)	Orphan
8	Geometric feature learning (talk)	Orphan
36	Solver (talk)	Stub
2	Norma (journal) (talk)	Stub
11	Adjoint equation (talk)	Stub
59	Discriminative model (talk)	Stub
56	Feature vector (talk)	Stub
97	Autoencoder (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

upon Soar train crash|Barrow upon Soar]]: collision between a train and a demolished bridge.}}
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Son of a bitch

	Why you deleted mu PAGE(DOA,DCRUST)
	Your ass is gonna ripped fella Paras27 (talk) 06:51, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 636: / Line 636: @@
 *<nowiki>|</nowiki>{{red|'''&#125;'''}}<nowiki></nowiki>
 It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, -2, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 11:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
+== Son of a bitch ==
+{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
+|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Trophy.png|100px]]
+|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Why you deleted mu PAGE(DOA,DCRUST)'''
+|-
+|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Your ass is gonna ripped fella [[User:Paras27|Paras27]] ([[User talk:Paras27|talk]]) 06:51, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
+|}