User talk:MithrandirAgain

Archive Quick Index
If you're looking for an older message, please look here for the Archive Quick Index.

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #234

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Level 4

Low to moderate level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

---

3.98 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 18:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

user talk:Ibraheemraja edits

Hi. It is always tempting to revert a user when he or she removes warnings from their talk page. However, WP:OWNTALK indicates that when a user removes a warning from their talk page it is taken as confirmation that the warning has been read. Therefore such actions would not be considered as vandalism and should not be reverted. Taroaldo (talk) 06:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo! Yes, I know about that rule, and only remembered it earlier today (too late to do anything.) Sorry for the trouble! I won't forget again! ;) --Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 22:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi! No problem. Cheers. Taroaldo (talk) 01:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

edits on 1Operaman

please delete this article all together. the article is about me and it is not only inaccurate, i do not want to be listed on wikipedia. thank you 1musicman11 (talk) 01:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo! As Drmies wrote, please do not edit other user's pages/talk pages without permission from that user unless it's vandalism (which, in this case, it wasn't.)

As to you wanting it removed, it's not a Wikipedia article. It's someone's user page, which means that they are working on the article. It is not yet an article. Second, if you are truly the person being written about, I suggest you ask the author on their talk page to not publish it. Please note though that unless you can provide verifiable proof that you are who you say you are, the user may refuse. If it becomes an article, you can nominate it to be deleted, provided there's a good reason or, as I said, prove your identity.

Again, it's not an article yet. The user was simply working on it on their home page. If still you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page.

Cheers! --Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 01:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Mithrandir,

regarding http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:1Operaman how do i prove my identity? what if 1Operaman doesn't respond? This is my info. please, i very much would like this removed.

thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1musicman11 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo again! Unfortunately, right now, there's not much I can do. But even if 1Operaman did create the article, it will be pulled anyway (See this.) So if it does go up, someone will nominate it for speedy deletion and it will be quickly pulled. In other words, I don't think you have much too worry about.

However, if you want 1Operaman to take the article down off his page, I suggest you ask him on his talk page. For identity, I suggest linking to some website where a picture of yourself or some other identifying information (not too personal ;)) with a post there saying that you wish to have the contents of the page in question removed. But that, of course, is more of a "last step" if he asks for it and I have no idea if he will. Also, in this day and age of anyone claiming they are anyone, he still might not believe you.

Hmm.. I just took a look at his contributions, and apparently he hasn't been on since 2007. I still suggest you ask him, but there's really nothing you, nor I, can do. I still don't think that there's much to worry about (a quick Google search proves this; the article doesn't appear unless you append it with "wikipedia".)

I think the two most things to do is a) Ask him on his talk page and b) Do not take the "article" off his page; it'll simply be reverted.

Good luck!--Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 06:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm... Now I see on User_talk:Ncmvocalist#Speedy deletion you wrote that you were 1Operaman and that you forgot the password. Yet on my page, you wrote like 1Operaman was someone entirely different. What's the true story? --Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 06:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello?

Hello —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.33.83.251 (talk) 07:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo. Is there something I can help you with? --Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 07:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Celine Dion

Just a quick comment. I saw that you recently edited a section of Celine Dion by another user who said she was a lesbian. I just wanted to let you know that you should be keen with what you type. Her son is not gay. He's nine years old, and I think it is wrong to create gossip such as that. Now, since it was in your explanation, it doesn't really matter, article wise. However, I just wanted to give you a heads up. Casually throwing words around, especially sensitive ones that that is ill-advised. I'm not judging you at all, I'm just letting you know my POV. Thanks. BalticPat22Patrick 01:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo! I wasn't trying to create gossip, I simply made an error when I looked it up online. (Next time, I'll read the article first, before I look it up online.) The person who said she was gay made an error in sources, and I guess I did too. Thanks for letting me know! I appreciate it! :) --Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 20:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit for Kolomotu'a

I like to edit the Kolomotu'a article to merge it with the Nuku'alofa article since Nuku'alofa is the original name and Kolomotu'a was a later addition to marked out the original settlement of Nuku'alofa.

Nuku'alofa article will be adjusted today and both the article for Kolomotu'a and Kolofo'ou should be redirected to Nuku'alofa.Puakatau (talk) 10:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo! Please do not post on my user page; please post on my talk page instead.

As to the article, I have no idea if what you're saying is true or not (I'll assume it is) but I think as long as you can cite your sources using reliable third-party sources, and don't add POV to the article, you will be fine. However, if you continue to blank articles, your edits may be undone (by myself or, more likely since I'm not on 24-7, by someone else.) Thank you! --Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 23:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Why are you reverting to the false headline

Why are you reverting to the false side of the story? Who told you that Ishrat was a terrorist?? The reverted story is biased and the version by Gujarat Police. You don't have the right to delete my post. I know you are a Hindu terrorist.