User talk:Jake Wartenberg

Click here to leave me a message

Anthony McCormack

The change I made to Anthony McCormack was reverted by yourself, as it appears to be unconstructive. I believe that the article is extremely inaccurate and the sources are disputable. How do I delte or nominate it for deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anth1234567890 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

See WP:AFD. Thanks, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 01:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Smiles!

DocDeel516 ^discuss has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for helping me with my enquiry at the Help desk about creating a wikiproject.--DocDeel516 ^discuss 21:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, and you're welcome! --Jake Wartenberg^Talk 22:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Likiwinks

Hi Jake,

I came up with an idea for an educational game using Wikipedia to teach kids (and adults) about how different encyclopedia entries may be linked and how to navigate around Wikipedia by using the wikilinks.

I submitted an entry but it got auto-deleted. I tried to add the {{hang on}} tag, but I'm not sure if it worked.

Can you please advise - was this a bad idea/use of Wikipedia?

Thanks,

Michael —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrpollock (talk • contribs)

Certainly. While Wikipedia is not for things made up one day, you absolutely can put this kind of content in your user space, as I see you have already done. An alternative would be to write about your idea elsewhere on the web (you might consider creating a web page for it). I really like your idea, by the way. Good luck. PS: Remember to sign your posts! Thanks, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 02:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

• Also, see Wikipedia:Wiki Game. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:25, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

hi im really srry and i will never do it agaon..;0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.19.126 (talk) 20:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Jake Wartenberg^Talk 20:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

Ok, sorry. I didn't think it would change it, and that was my source that was better, because I still can't verify the source and that is a personal experience. mynameinc 22:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

No worries! Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 02:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Robert Beckford

The statements I have added to the criticism section on the Robert Beckford page are to balance fair and reasonable. No academic criticism hads been cited and no vandalism has been commited. Please stop harrassing fellow wikipedians —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.178.44 (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Please read this talk page's header. The manner in witch your posted your comment is very disruptive (I have repaired the damage). Regarding your criticism, please see WP:NPOV and stop trying to insert your own point of view into this encyclopedia.--Jake Wartenberg^Talk 20:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

It is not "point of view" to emphasise the lack of cited academic criticism in the criticism section of an article about an academic, rather balancing out the truth more fairly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.178.44 (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I think that you were emphasizing far too much. But I have noticed that you have voluntarily toned down your language, and appreciate it. Do you think that you can accept the current revision I have made as a compromise? Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 18:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Moved to Talk:Robert Beckford

 – --Jake Wartenberg^Talk 19:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

"Hush" was not written by Deep Purple.

The song "Hush" was not "written" by Deep Purple. In fact, they are the second artist to record a cover of that song! (The first one was Billy Joe Royal) The song was written by Joe South. Check out the article under his name and you'll see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.99.144.208 (talk) 20:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

I bet you're right, as I know absolutely nothing on the topic. But you need to cite a source, and probably say who wrote the song in the same place that you make that assertion. Cheers, and happy editing! --Jake Wartenberg^Talk 20:59, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

To Whom It May Concern.

Hello,

I am very sorry to this result. However, I have just made an account on Wikipedia-- and are not that familiar with these sort of guidelines (Yes, I have read the beginners section) I am shocked by your warnings towards me; even though I have presented thus, evidence of the truth.

Such as? I would like you and me to agree upon this conflict between Greater and Metro Vancouver Personally , I would go with both because the district still uses Greater Vancouver in the water and plumage systems ; Environment Canada still uses Greater Vancouver in Watches and Warnings, etc. I would also go with Metro Vancouver 50% because it is metropolitan , but who doesn't know that Vancouver's a populous city? Everyone knows Toronto is a metropolitan city, and it still uses GTA [Greater Toronto Area]

Hopefully you can agree upon with me ; I am just fixing up some sentence flaws, I am unclear of how this is called Vandalism [Yes again, I have read through the guidelines, however to this myself I am unclear]

PS. The Picture about Arbutus Ridge is looking upon Downtown Vancouver ; to be more specific.

Thank you in regards; Please talk to me if you have any concerns or questions.

Thank you the most sincerely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiarecooll (talk • contribs) 03:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments are not the best place for extended discussion. Please discuss controversial changes you intent to make on the article's talk page. In the meantime, I have restored the article to it's original version. Thanks, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 03:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

You may wish to reply here, Jake. :) Regards, — Aitias // discussion 03:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Holy Crap! I did not realize that Huggle had done that, and have withdrawn my report. I need to pay closer attention ;) Thanks, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 03:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

No problem. — Aitias // discussion 03:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I have vandalized the page, "even though I didn't know about it until I read the Vandalizehelppage" but saying sorry doesnt hurt :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiarecooll (talk • contribs) 04:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

It most certainly does not. Welcome to Wikipedia! Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 04:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

You are very kind; and thank you Happy Holidays

but although, I need some help. Personally, about the Metro and Greater Vancouver thing I really want to do something about it; (i have been changing some sentence structure but) however I keep on getting the vandalized message.

Should I go to the controversial page site?

Oops , sorry I forgot to sign. Iiarecooll (talk) 04:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I am not quite sure what you mean when you say "the controversial page site". In any event, you should read this discussion, if you have not already. Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 04:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks and regards

Sorry for causing trouble for everybody on this Christmas Day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iiarecooll (talk • contribs) 04:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Iiarecooll (talk) 04:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

No worries --Jake Wartenberg^Talk 04:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

fuck you you nhialist