User talk:J.delanoy

My wheel-warring policy:

Admins: If you see me make a logged action that you think I should not have done, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you undo it without asking for my permission. However, if I marked the action as being done after running a checkuser query, or as part of a sockpuppet investigation, you should ask me or another checkuser before undoing it. In any case, if you do revert one of my actions, I would appreciate it if you tell me that you did so. Thanks!

Russian language, fyi

Hey you just blocked 91.77.129.245 for linkspam on Russian language. He is back as 91.77.252.41 and spamming as usual. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		I'm awarding you this barnstar of diligence for your combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service to wikipedia. South Bay (talk) 22:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

nom nom nom

andyzweb (talk) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.

Thanks for all the great editing you do!!! andyzweb (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocking of 68.193.162.27.

I think you blocked it too early. It was only at its third warning. It would have needed to receive one more warning (fourth warning) to qualify for a block, yes? - Zhang He (talk) 07:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, four warnings are the norm, but there is no requirement that any specific number of warnings, or even any at all, be given before a block may be made. Especially in cases of very blatant personal attacks, like that guy did. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 15:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

He was actually only warned twice before the block. But, given the nature of his edits, I support the block. Useight (talk) 15:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

The first warning was a level two warning, though. Anyway, I'm not saying I don't support the block; I just think it deserved one more warning before being blocked. - Zhang He (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

spi/chu?

Is it fishing to ask for checkuser against User:Wemmert, whose user page says this account was created in response to "my previous ban"? tedder (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

HI :o)

80.47.229.201 (talk) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.

Just spreading de lurve :o)

Advertising

[1] [2]

• (cur) (prev) 19:45, 28 January 2010 72.82.214.29 (Talk) (21,247 bytes) (Yowusa please stop advertising your region.) (undo)
• (cur) (prev) 17:28, 26 January 2010 Yowuza (Talk | contribs) (21,247 bytes) (Undid revision 340022488 by 72.82.209.46 (talk)) (undo)
• (cur) (prev) 23:14, 25 January 2010 72.82.209.46 (Talk) (21,242 bytes) (Undid revision 339976402 by Yowuza (talk)) (undo)
• (cur) (prev) 19:15, 25 January 2010 Yowuza (Talk | contribs) (21,247 bytes) (Undid revision 339967782 by 72.82.209.46 (talk)) (undo)
• (cur) (prev) 18:25, 25 January 2010 72.82.209.46 (Talk) (21,242 bytes) (Undid revision 339770418 by Yowuza (talk)) (undo)
• (cur) (prev) 17:51, 25 January 2010 72.73.89.146 (Talk) (21,247 bytes) (→Technical history) (undo)
• (cur) (prev) 19:04, 24 January 2010 Yowuza (Talk | contribs) (21,240 bytes) (rv) (undo)
• (cur) (prev) 04:15, 24 January 2010 72.82.212.158 (Talk) (21,235 bytes) (Spelling) (undo)

It is kind of very obvious. --Yowuza yadderhouse | meh 16:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Rangeblocks

Try to use a templated block reason for range blocks such as {{anonblock}}, as it provides more information to the blocked users. Prodego ^talk 00:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Help needed with reincarnations of Tfoxworth

I was referred to you by The Thing That Should Not Be for help. He recently intervened in the near-daily ritual of reverting the vandalisms of the ever-changing sockpuppets of permanently banned User:Tfoxworth. The latter's persistence over several years is flagrant and worse -- an invitation to others to mimic his evasions. A helpful admin recently said we're pretty much out-maneuvered. But I believe he can be stopped with help, as suggested here. Thanks for any consideration. FactStraight (talk) 03:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)