Jump to content

User talk:Feydey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 105: Line 105:


i have no personal greviences with the new constituited karki mutt pontiff.. my point is very clear.. wikipedia is renowned platform to present true facts and informations relating to the subject. i appreciate ur efforts. but my concern is towards uniting the vast splitted daivajnya brahmins. ur facts relating to the community mutt and traditions is subject to represent only one side of sonars. when ur article is representing the whole of daivajnya samaj i.e approx 2 million daivajnya souls . u have the responsibility to publish both the mutt and their representing pontiffs. if ur not doing so. ur giving a wrong message not only to us daivajnya brahmins but also to the other communities and general public.
i have no personal greviences with the new constituited karki mutt pontiff.. my point is very clear.. wikipedia is renowned platform to present true facts and informations relating to the subject. i appreciate ur efforts. but my concern is towards uniting the vast splitted daivajnya brahmins. ur facts relating to the community mutt and traditions is subject to represent only one side of sonars. when ur article is representing the whole of daivajnya samaj i.e approx 2 million daivajnya souls . u have the responsibility to publish both the mutt and their representing pontiffs. if ur not doing so. ur giving a wrong message not only to us daivajnya brahmins but also to the other communities and general public.

u have no right to threaten me. nor stop me from propogating the true facts and thoughts. ur arrogence has no place here. u try to respect and bow to ancient school of thoughts. i have been very patient to u. but u seem to be disgusting.

Revision as of 16:17, 25 June 2009

Comment

Welcome User, please state your comments after the others. -- Feydey.

Click to leave me a new message

Sign your comments by adding four tildes (~~~~). Messages left on this page will usually lead me to reply on your talk page; however, I may use both for extended discussions. Questions?


File source problem with File:Rammersand.jpg

I have done some changes to the licensing please have a look. Its been shot my cell phone :) Vertical.limit (talk) 15:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wighnomy2.jpg

Hey there,

I am pending on permission from the "Speaking In Code" filmmaker, Amy Grill, to use this image on the Wighnomy Brothers entry. Until I have confirmation, I will delete the image from the wiki and re-upload with the proper license.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwearshoess (talk • contribs) 17:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Permission granted

I have just forwarded you a personal mail sent to me by administrator of "daivajna.org" granting me the permission to upload pictures from their website.Please do check!

Thanks!

Gautamgoa1984 (talk) 05:21, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:F1 team

Hi,

Why was this deleted? When a page is moved, isn't it sensible to leave the previous page as a redirect to the new one? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per CSD#G8 talk pages are deleted when the main page is deleted. Best, feydey (talk) 19:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Right, yes. The thing is, it was really merged and not deleted. I've re-added the redirect. Cheers. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Permission granted

I have just forwarded you a personal mail sent to me by administrator of kalikadevikasarpal.com granting me the permission to upload pictures from their website.Please do check!

Thanks!

Gautamgoa1984 (talk) 04:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Thanks for your message on uploading the highest resolution images. As an aside, could you please delete these 4 wiki images which have been moved to Commons under slightly different names:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Scolanova_synagogue.jpg

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:San_Fernando.JPG

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:IMG_0250.jpg

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Ierapetra.JPG

Thank You very much, Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kudaldeshkar Adya Gaud Brahmins(Ajgaonkar,Thakur,Khanolkar,Samant, Bawkar, Desai,dabholkar....etc.)

Hi Gautam,

I see you had removed Kudaldeshkar as one of the sub sects of Goud Saraswats. Can you please mention the reason.


Thanks, Suresh Prabhu

Note

I could not know about the duplicate image on the Bective Abbey. There was no link to it on Wikipedia, I don't think. I tried to transfer the image and it said another different looking image file with the same exists on Commons. That was why I chose 2006. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How should I upload this so that it is not deleted? The head of the organization gave me permission to upload the logo as I mentioned in the summary. There should be no reason to delete it, and my apologies for not uploading it under the correct criteria if I did indeed do so. [3] --Gloriamarie (talk) 03:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i have no personal greviences with the new constituited karki mutt pontiff.. my point is very clear.. wikipedia is renowned platform to present true facts and informations relating to the subject. i appreciate ur efforts. but my concern is towards uniting the vast splitted daivajnya brahmins. ur facts relating to the community mutt and traditions is subject to represent only one side of sonars. when ur article is representing the whole of daivajnya samaj i.e approx 2 million daivajnya souls . u have the responsibility to publish both the mutt and their representing pontiffs. if ur not doing so. ur giving a wrong message not only to us daivajnya brahmins but also to the other communities and general public.

i have no personal greviences with the new constituited karki mutt pontiff.. my point is very clear.. wikipedia is renowned platform to present true facts and informations relating to the subject. i appreciate ur efforts. but my concern is towards uniting the vast splitted daivajnya brahmins. ur facts relating to the community mutt and traditions is subject to represent only one side of sonars. when ur article is representing the whole of daivajnya samaj i.e approx 2 million daivajnya souls . u have the responsibility to publish both the mutt and their representing pontiffs. if ur not doing so. ur giving a wrong message not only to us daivajnya brahmins but also to the other communities and general public.

i have no personal greviences with the new constituited karki mutt pontiff.. my point is very clear.. wikipedia is renowned platform to present true facts and informations relating to the subject. i appreciate ur efforts. but my concern is towards uniting the vast splitted daivajnya brahmins. ur facts relating to the community mutt and traditions is subject to represent only one side of sonars. when ur article is representing the whole of daivajnya samaj i.e approx 2 million daivajnya souls . u have the responsibility to publish both the mutt and their representing pontiffs. if ur not doing so. ur giving a wrong message not only to us daivajnya brahmins but also to the other communities and general public.

u have no right to threaten me. nor stop me from propogating the true facts and thoughts. ur arrogence has no place here. u try to respect and bow to ancient school of thoughts. i have been very patient to u. but u seem to be disgusting.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Feydey&oldid=298582661"