User talk:Drr-darkomen: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Drr-darkomen/Archives/2009/August. |
→Why?: new section |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
I took out a fight that was listed twice under the UFC 105 page, i'm confused about what youe are going at. Were you just trying to say i needing to put in an edit summary? [[User:Jackson beet|Jackson beet]] ([[User talk:Jackson beet|talk]]) 23:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC) |
I took out a fight that was listed twice under the UFC 105 page, i'm confused about what youe are going at. Were you just trying to say i needing to put in an edit summary? [[User:Jackson beet|Jackson beet]] ([[User talk:Jackson beet|talk]]) 23:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
::hey no worries, i didnt realize edit summaries were used like that and stuff, but i'll use them now, so thanks! [[User:Jackson beet|Jackson beet]] ([[User talk:Jackson beet|talk]]) 23:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC) |
::hey no worries, i didnt realize edit summaries were used like that and stuff, but i'll use them now, so thanks! [[User:Jackson beet|Jackson beet]] ([[User talk:Jackson beet|talk]]) 23:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Why? == |
|||
Why are you deleting my edits? |
Revision as of 03:50, 3 September 2009
|
|
UFC 103
Don't know why Henderson would be put there when he aint even rumored for that fight (More Like Tito Oritz I heard.) Well I guess now it's Franklin-Belfort (Much better)
Help
Could you look at Brian Bowles' page for me please? The new WEC bantamweight champion, errors have occurred (not by me) that I can't seem to remedy, thank you. --Ecclesispastic2489 (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2009
File copyright problem with File:UFC 104 Machida vs. Shogun.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:UFC 104 Machida vs. Shogun.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 13:23, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Copywriting can be hard to avoid, please make sure it doesnt happen, its a shame if people and the site were sued for the damages that may occur, thanks buddy (Punisher88 (talk) 01:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)) and thanks FeyDey
THIAGO SILVA
well i'll do my part in making sure your power trip is reviewed as well.good bye
Thiago Silva wins by KO not TKO
when I said Jardine lost by KO because he was unconscious, that was evidence the official decision was a KO, and it is officially a KO, and says so on Sherdog and UFC.com, research before you end up proving yourself wrong, making it look like you don't know what you're doing and looking like an idiot. Itsmacko (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- What's with all the angry people lately? :\ Is is because we're getting close to fall/autumn? --aktsu (t / c) 22:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, nothing to add really. Hard to assume it's anything but WP:OR with the edit summary "Jardine was unconscious". I just happen to always go to the ACs since they're the actual authority on results, unlike both the UFC and Sherdog. Too bad some of them still don't publish the reports online though (I'm looking at you CSAC)... --aktsu (t / c) 23:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Infobox Martial artist biography template
The Infobox is quite large already and certain fighters have held quite a few titles in various regional shows. That said put it up for discussion, I've got no problem adding them if there is consensus. --Phospheros (talk) 03:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
What are you talking about?
I took out a fight that was listed twice under the UFC 105 page, i'm confused about what youe are going at. Were you just trying to say i needing to put in an edit summary? Jackson beet (talk) 23:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- hey no worries, i didnt realize edit summaries were used like that and stuff, but i'll use them now, so thanks! Jackson beet (talk) 23:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Why?
Why are you deleting my edits?