User talk:5 albert square

Today is Wednesday, 4 December 2024, and the current time is 03:13 (UTC/GMT). There are currently 6,919,476 articles. this page for a new update.

Use Wikipedia at your own risk! Inspired by BlankVerse talk

Wikipedia:General disclaimer Use Wikipedia at your own risk How to separate the wheat from the chaff How to avoid drama Wikipedia does not give medical advice Wikipedia does not give legal opinions Wikipedia contains content you may find objectionable Wikipedia contains spoilers Wikipedia articles may contain nonsense Wikipedia articles may be vandalized Many Wikipedia articles may not have a neutral point of view In trying to edit a Wikipedia article, you may encounter edit warriors Wikipedia is a work in progress Wikipedia articles may have (numerous) spelling and grammar errors Wikipedia articles may have errors of fact and errors of omission Wikipedia has a strong bias towards Western culture Wikipedia has a strong bias towards popular culture WIKIPEDIA IS AN ENCYCLOPEDIA An encyclopedia is a written compendium aiming to convey information on all branches of knowledge. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A DUMPING GROUND FOR RANDOM INFORMATION WIKIPEDIA IS NOT FOR UNCITABLE MATERIAL WIKIPEDIA IS NOT CENSORED WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A BUREAUCRACY WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A DEMOCRACY WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A BLOG SERVICE WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A MESSAGE BOARD WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A FREE ADVERTISING SPACE WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A PLACE TO PUBLISH YOUR NEW IDEAS WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A PLACE TO PUBLISH YOUR POINT OF VIEW Wikipedia is not nearly this in-your-face most of the time

Wikipedia ads	file info – #180

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Hi everyone

Welcome to my talk page!

If you post a message here then please add this page to your watchlist as I will reply here. If I ask you a question on your talk page then please reply on your talk page as I will be watching it.

Finally please remember to sign your signature using the button.

Archived discussions: User talk:5 albert square/Archive 1

Archived discussions: User talk:5 albert square/Archive 2 Archived discussions: User talk:5 albert square/Archive 3

Archived discussions: User talk:5 albert square/Archive 4

Donna Freedman

Hello. Perhaps I added it hastily without discussion. I know she has only referenced it once onscreen after the kiss, but as per interview] with Bower last year, she said there was no point exploring her bisexuality, because they couldn't do it any justice in their timeslot. She's been listed over in the LGBT in fiction list on WP for some time too without it being contested, I kind of thought someone just forgot to add the category.RAIN the ONE (Talk) 00:15, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

No worries, I was just a little surprised to see it :) --5 albert square (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

hi, i was wondering if you could put this userbox about "this user spends way to much time on wikipedia...........after one more edit" on my talk page , because i tried to do it my self and they wouldnt let me upload the image!, if you dont mind,thanx!--STAND-UP-2-P (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2010 (UTC)STAND-UP-2-P

 Done --5 albert square (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks very much for placing the userbox on my talk pages!--STAND-UP-2-P (talk) 02:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)STAND-UP-2-P

You're welcome :), any further questions feel free to ask :) --5 albert square (talk) 03:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

AnemoneProjectors has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Though I did tell myself I wouldn't have any snacks tonight lol AnemoneProjectors 21:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Lol you're like me! In a good mood tonight, just about to hand ClueBot a cookie though not sure if bots should really have them lol --5 albert square (talk) 21:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

A cookie might mess up bots' insides :( AnemoneProjectors 22:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Well if he's not allowed then just means that Cobi got two! By the way it would seem that Nigel Harman's page has been the victim of a sock puppet :( --5 albert square (talk) 22:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Do you know all the sockpuppets? That page isn't on my watchlist, but I wouldn't have known anyway. Plus they self-reverted. AnemoneProjectors 22:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't know all the sockpuppets no but I know the usual faces like Trueman31, Ln of x etc. Apparently this IP was blocked as a sock of Jake Duncan? It's a new one on me but from what I can see he targetted a few EastEnders pages, Johnny Allen's page was also targetted. I saw the same IP edit Nigel Harman the other day to say that he'd died in Glasgow but because the person self-reverted I didn't take it any further --5 albert square (talk) 22:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh he's the guy who made up the Willoughby Crescent hoax. I did come across some of his edits recently. AnemoneProjectors 23:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I was going to say looking at the sock puppeteers edits you had messaged him. From memory I think he targetted John Partridge, Christian Clarke, EastEnders, Johnny Allen and Nigel Harman. Probably more EastEnders pages but those are the ones I can think of offhand. Meh, vandals! --5 albert square (talk) 23:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I reverted his edits on Johnny Allen. He created an article for Johnny's supposed cellmate who he said "Get Jake" or whatever, which was PRODded but I just speedied it as a hoax cos the character was never named. AnemoneProjectors 23:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I can never understand pages like that. Granted "Who Shot Phil?" has it's own page but then that storyline did delay the kick off of a football game whilst it was announced it was Lisa so it is worth it's own page. I see someones currently spreading rumours that Sam Callis is to join EastEnders. I wish that were true, as a matter of fact I wouldn't actually mind it if the entire cast of The Bill jumped ship over to EastEnders once filmings finished on The Bill. It would be company for Scott! --5 albert square (talk) 23:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

That's not allowed. EastEnders actors go to The Bill, not the other way around. But where are they gonna go now? I seem to be the only person asking this question (and I have been since the announcement). P.S. I ran out of biscuits even though I said I wouldn't eat any! Oh and I have no idea what you're going on about with "Who Shot Phil?" ;) AnemoneProjectors 23:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

JuneGloom07 Talk? has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Thank you for the cookie! :) - JuneGloom07 Talk? 21:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome!  :) --5 albert square (talk) 21:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Well since we're all giving things out:

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:WikiPint}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 5 albert square. You have new messages at Tommy2010's talk page.
Message added 00:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I think you'll like this lol Tommy2010 00:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Ringo Brown

Thanks for the note. Yes, the image has been sent to FFD; however, that was done well after my edit. I've again removed it, simply because the tag is for files that are up for some sort of speedy deletion; files at FFD don't generally have the deletable-image-caption. Nyttend (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Offense? In no way was I offended; I simply was trying to explain, and I didn't mean to trouble you. Nyttend (talk) 04:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

There's never anything wrong with notifying the uploader. Please do it if you so desire. Nyttend (talk) 05:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Nyttend. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please remember to discuss the contributions of the editor and not the person as you did on User talk:Nyttend and http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Ringo_Brown&diff=next&oldid=362932265 Bidgee (talk) 04:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry?

The edit summary I posted stated "reverted good faith edit" before simply stating why I reverted the edit - I've always believed that was what edit summaries were for. The reason I posted on the users talk page was to be polite explain my reasons for the revert. How reverting the edit via the Twinkle good faith method is not assuming good faith I don't know. I'm sorry to have offended you :( --5 albert square (talk) 04:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence User_talk:Raintheone. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Bidgee (talk) 04:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Again sorry?!

I left the message "Hi

This is to let you know that the image for Ringo Brown has been nominated for deletion. I came across it quite accidentally, you can find details of the nomination here. Please feel free to add any comments :)"

I was simply letting them know that the image is up for deletion - whether or not they vote to keep it is up to them. I'm actually incredibly offended at the messages you've left on my talk page, am feeling very bitten by them --5 albert square (talk) 04:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree with Bidgee's opinion. In general, it's quite appropriate to notify a small number of individuals; there's nothing wrong with talking with just a couple of others as you've done, especially since you didn't say anything like "vote keep!". Nyttend (talk) 04:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

The Motor City Machine Guns

I was not trying to be nonconstructive. I was merely correcting the spelling of the team's name and linking to that page 68.175.49.82 (talk) 01:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Ah ok, I would suggest then that you put that in the edit summary when you're setting up the redirect. I simply saw that you were blanking the page without giving a reason? --5 albert square (talk) 02:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet?

My gut instinct is telling me that User:Chryed is User:The Twelfth Doctor aka User:The Queen Victoria aka User:Archie Mitchell evading his block, but I don't have a lot of evidence other than the EastEnders username. I saw you were involved with an SPI for the user and wondered what you thought. AnemoneProjectors 21:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmmmm I'm really not sure. My gut instinct is saying the same but I don't think there is enough evidence to say for sure that they are. If they are this time they seem to be editing nicer than what they were before! I'll have a deeper look into some more of their edits --5 albert square (talk) 21:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I went quite deep to find something but they're staying away from similar things, probably cleverly trying not to get caught. I don't suppose we can do an SPI on gut instinct with no real evidence, can we? AnemoneProjectors 21:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't think we can, it would probably be seen as assuming bad faith. I've left a message on User:J.delanoy's talk page as I remember that he was one of the checkusers involved in my SPI, asking for his opinion on things --5 albert square (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. AnemoneProjectors 22:12, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I don't know the details of the case, but having had a quick look I don't think it's blatantly the same person and they do seem to be behaving themselves so far. You could take it to SPI, but you'd probably be told that  CheckUser is not for fishing. Definitely worth keeping an eye on... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm keeping an eye on it. I think I know what I'm looking for. AnemoneProjectors 22:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

IP Vandal

Hello to you, and thank you for dealing with this disruptive edit. Only a few minutes or so before that came in, I had cleared out my watchlist. Surprisingly, I was active at that time checking recent changes as you too had been; somehow I never noticed the edit, nor your revert, nor your warning to the IP!! Incredible how you can spot things in the distance and not realise the matters close to home. Thanks for your help! Keep up your good work. Evlekis (Евлекис) 19:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome :) --5 albert square (talk) 19:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)