User:Zeqin/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: (link) New Youth New Youth
Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
New Youth is an important magazine to cultivate the new thought and culture to young people in China in early 20 century.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Yes, it shows the development of the magazine.
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Yes, it introduce the topic about the magazine.
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
Yes, it shows the historical background.
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
concise

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes.
Is the content up-to-date? Yes.
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No.
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes.

Is the article neutral? Yes.
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Underrepresented, it does not show the influence on the social environment.
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
Are the sources current? Yes.
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Yes, it is clear.
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Yes, the organization is good, and the sections show the content clearly.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
The talk page shows some comments about the viewpoints.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
Stub-class. It is a part of WikiPojects Magazines, WikiProjects China and WikiProjects literature.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
It does not have question about the article, the comment just about the article topic.

What is the article's overall status?
The article is clear and easy to read, but it can show more specific details.
What are the article's strengths?
It describes the development of the magazine clearly.
How can the article be improved?
It can show the influence and the historical background.
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
It is well-developed because it can show the development of the magazine and show the topic about that.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~