User:Zc012/Communication/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.

The Classical Approach: The classical approach comes from the management theory by Frederick Taylor who was the founder of the scientific management theory as well.^[1] The main idea of the classical approach of organizational communication is that the theory compares organizations to a machine. The theory observed and analyze that workers perform the task they are given to in order to contribute to the overall well being of the organization. Each member has their purpose in the group, just like a part of a machine works does its tasks while cooperate with other parts to have a well-managed, functioning machine. Additionally, just like a machine that collapse when one part fails to function. An organization will fall apart when members are not doing their designated task appropriately^[2]. The Human Relation Approach: The human relation approach is based from several different theorists such as: Elton Mayo, McGregors’s Douglas, Abraham Maslow, Mary Parker Follett’s and Argyris..^[1] The main idea of the human relation approach of organizational communication is that the theory compares organizations to a family. As this theory compares organization to a family, it focuses on workers satisfaction and the relationship within the organizations more compared to the work performance element.^[3] The human relation approach emphasizes the importance of employee attitudes, and encourage organizations management team to focus on interpersonal relationships, group dynamics, and leadership styles in achieving organizational effectiveness. ^[4]

References

EVALUATE THE INFLUENCE OF CLASSICAL AND HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACHES IN MANAGEMENT TODAY
^ "Classical Theories of Organizational Communication". Dec 3, 2020
Cooley, Scott (2017). Human Relations Theory of Organization. GLOBAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC POLICY, AND GOVERNANCE. ISBN 9783319318165.
"American Psychological Association". APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved March 4, 2022.

^ ^a ^b EVALUATE THE INFLUENCE OF CLASSICAL AND HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACHES IN MANAGEMENT TODAY
^ EVALUATE THE INFLUENCE OF CLASSICAL AND HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACHES IN MANAGEMENT TODAY
^ Cooley, Scott (2017). Human Relations Theory of Organization. GLOBAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC POLICY, AND GOVERNANCE. ISBN 9783319318165.
^ "American Psychological Association". APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved March 4, 2022.

[:0-1] EVALUATE THE INFLUENCE OF CLASSICAL AND HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACHES IN MANAGEMENT TODAY

[:02-2] EVALUATE THE INFLUENCE OF CLASSICAL AND HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACHES IN MANAGEMENT TODAY

[3] Cooley, Scott (2017). Human Relations Theory of Organization. GLOBAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC POLICY, AND GOVERNANCE. ISBN 9783319318165.

[4] "American Psychological Association". APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved March 4, 2022.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]