User:Zarens/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Hunt sabotage
- I found this article on the stub section for WikiProject Animal rights. Also, I think animals are interesting and saw the topic on the general page.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes, it includes information regarding definitions.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? its very concise, to the point of feeling too short
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes.
- Is the content up-to-date? Revised in september of 2019, so fairly recent for such a specific topic.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There is a lot of content missing regarding the definitions required.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? no, it only takes into perspective the advocacy group.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, just missing information from harder to get sources.