User:Za'NettaS/Pearl Cleage/NoahMullens Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
  • Za'NettaS
• Link to draft you're reviewing:
  • User:Za'NettaS/Pearl Cleage

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
  • On the original article, it needs to mention what you are adding. So, mention briefly her inspirations.
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
  • Yes (og article)
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
  • Yes (og article)
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
  • No (og article)
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
  • It seems a little too short in the og article, but the article itself is pretty short.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?
  • Yes
• Is the content added up-to-date?
  • Yesd
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
  • No

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
  • "she must write about the struggle for black people to be free and how she not feel oppressed by this idea"
    • I would break this sentence up, and explain what she means when she says she does not feel oppressed by the idea
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • No
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • Maybe flesh out more what you mean about her inspirations, citing specific books that inspired her. Be a little more specific to add content. And, also, in the og article you might be able to add more information to existing sections.
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
  • No

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
  • Yes. However, you need to cite it not in the text, but through the citation tool.
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
  • Yes, they seem to.
• Are the sources current?
  • Yes
• Check a few links. Do they work?
  • There are no links

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
  • Ye, but some of the sentences could be fleshed out or reorganized to be a little more clear.
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
  • No
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
  • You are adding an influences section, but I do not know where in the article, so I cannot really answer this question

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
  • N/A
• Are images well-captioned?
  • N/A
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
  • N/A
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
  • N/A

note: you could add a picture of her to the article

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
  • N/A
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
  • N/A
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
  • N/A
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
  • N/A

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
  • Yes, it would strengthen the article by citing influences and adding more about her life.
• What are the strengths of the content added?
  • It fleshes out her involvement in Black Arts and her literary influences
• How can the content added be improved?
  • • You could add more to the article in general, since there is not much in the og article