User:Yixin97/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Shanghai Disneyland Park
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
I am a fan of Disney and I want to visit Shanghai Disneyland after I go back to China, so I need some information about it.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Yes.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
No.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
No.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
It is concise.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
Yes.
- Is the content up-to-date?
No. For the attendance part, the 2019 data does not update.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
No.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral?
Yes.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
No.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
No.
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
No.
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
Not all facts are from reliable secondary sources.
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
Yes.
- Are the sources current?
Yes.
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Yes.
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Yes.
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
Yes, a little bit.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
No.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
Yes.
- Are images well-captioned?
Yes.
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
Yes.
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Yes.
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
No conversations.
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
Star-class, Low-importance. Yes, WikiProject China and WikiProject Disney.
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Wikipedia discusses externals links instead of the content.
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status?
Readers can have a understand of Shanghai Disneyland, but the article needs more pictures and updated data.
- What are the article's strengths?
Concise and clear content.
- How can the article be improved?
Insert more attractive images and add more contents.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Underdeveloped.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: Talk:Shanghai Disneyland Park