User:Yahya/khelaghor

Graffiti in Dhaka

Graffiti in Dhaka has long been a medium for public expression, but it gained significant prominence during the 2024 student movement. The walls of Dhaka, particularly around Dhaka University, became canvases for political messages, calls for reform, and expressions of societal frustrations. This resurgence of graffiti art was driven by students and activists as a form of peaceful protest against discrimination, inequality, and political oppression.

Historical Context

The use of graffiti in Dhaka can be traced back to various socio-political movements in Bangladesh. However, its role as a tool for activism was revitalized in 2024, during a period of significant political turmoil and civil unrest. The student movement, driven by demands for a more inclusive and democratic government, saw graffiti emerge as a powerful symbol of resistance and hope. The walls of key locations, such as the Teacher-Student Centre (TSC) and various halls at Dhaka University, were covered with art that reflected the aspirations and grievances of the youth.

2024 Student Movement

The 2024 student movement was marked by a series of protests against the then-ruling government, demanding reforms in governance, and an end to discrimination. Graffiti played a central role in these protests, with students using walls to express their visions for a new Bangladesh. This movement, branded under initiatives like "Colours for Reform," involved over 50 artists and 300 volunteers who transformed city walls into vibrant artworks.

Graffiti during this time included slogans for secularism, democracy, and social harmony, as well as artistic depictions of recent events and historical figures significant to the anti-discrimination movement. Some pieces were designed to commemorate the victims of political violence, while others aimed to inspire civic engagement and unity.

Public Reaction

The public reaction to the graffiti in Dhaka was mixed. Many viewed it as a necessary and powerful form of expression, reflective of the collective aspirations of a frustrated generation. The graffiti was seen as an artistic protest against systemic issues, with some arguing that even controversial or explicit content served to highlight deep-seated societal issues.

On the other hand, some residents and officials criticized certain aspects of the graffiti, particularly those that used vulgar language or depicted aggressive imagery. This sparked a debate over the balance between freedom of expression and maintaining public decorum. In response, some groups undertook efforts to preserve impactful messages while removing or repainting parts deemed inappropriate.

Legacy

The graffiti of 2024 left a lasting impact on the urban landscape of Dhaka. It not only captured the spirit of a pivotal moment in the nation's history but also set a precedent for the use of public art as a form of protest and social commentary in Bangladesh. The vibrant murals and messages continue to remind citizens of the ongoing struggle for a more just and equitable society.