User:Xujial202/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: Sustainable Development Goal 1
Reason I choose this Article because in recent years, there have been different interpretations of international organizations and common goals, and these different interpretations have often produced non-neutral content. So I would like to evaluate this content.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Lead included an introductory sentence and clearly described topic.
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Lead included a brief description.
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Most of informationd presented in the article.
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- Lead comparely of overdetailed, but acceptable.

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Yes they are relevant to the topic.
Is the content up-to-date?
- Content and Data is up-to-date.
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- This article included all content that UN SDGs wish to include, and it includes current events, such as the impact of COVID-19.
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
- The article includes the poverty status of various population groups, such as different genders, regions, etc., but lacks detailed data analysis. However, detailed data analysis is missing and the problems faced between different countries are also missing.

Is the article neutral?
- The article is neutral in general, it analyzes the situation we are facing from multiple perspectives, but at the same time there are some missing viewpoints that cause the neutrality to suffer.
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- No there is no heabily biased position.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- No, all viewpoints are all well illustrated.
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- No, the overall tendency of the article is to let more people know about SDGs and not to deliberately guide the reader.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Yes, most of the resources can be easily accessed, but some of the links are no longer valid.
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Yes sources are thorough.
Are the sources current?
- Most sources are current sources, but some data are out-of-date, such as statistical chart.
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
- This sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors, but don's include historically marginalized individuals.
Check a few links. Do they work?
- Most links work.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- The articles are well organized, with a thorough table of contents and references, so the reader can get what he or she wants.
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- There is no grammatical and spelling errors.
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- The article divides No Poverty into eight broad headings, the second of which is divided into eight subheadings. Each of these items covers introduction, analysis, examples, and conclusion. So this article is well-organized.

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Yes article included a number of maps and statistical charts to interpret the article.
Are images well-captioned?
- Yes images are well-captioned
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Yes, all images are marked with the source of the material.
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
- Some of the images are highly visually appealing.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- The conversations includes the main tone and rating of this article.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- This article is C-class article, article is within Wikiprojects.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- Wikipedia gives a general idea and does not critically address the issues.

What is the article's overall status?
- Wikipedia community detailed described about what the Sustainable Development Goals are and what No Poverty is. However, compared to other articles this one is a bit redundant and there is some reprtitive content present in this article.
What are the article's strengths?
- Positively, with a sense of promotion.
How can the article be improved?
- Yes, some redundancy and repetition needs to be removed, and inserted picture need to be updated.
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
- By consulting the contents of the United Nations website and combining journals and papers. This article is well-developed.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~