User:WolfKnight314/Devil's Path (Catskills)
 | This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Lead Section
Not much of a lead section, but does give a beefing description of where they are and why they were named the devils pathways. Does not give much other information.
Content
The content of this article is not bad, however, it does not have much content at all. It is very short and does not go into much detail when describing the devils pathway.
Tone and Balance
This section was good. I could not pick up on any sort of biased tone. It seemed very neutral in giving just data. The balance of sources however is very bad, there is only one source.
Sources and References
There is only one source for this page. There need to be more sources in total, and there needs to be more in text citations. This part of the article is very bad.
Organization and Writing Quality
The article is not organized into different distinct sections. However, this article does flow fairly well and did not have grammar errors. The sentences could definitely be improved however. That being said, the writing quality was not bad, but could definitely be improved.
Images and Media
There is one picture of these mountains from far away. I think it would be pretty easy to add more pictures like a close up of the cliffs and deep gaps.
Talk Page Discussion
The talk page is incredibly weak, there is one question, and a response to that, but this does not bring much new information to the article. Also, apparently I made a post on the talk page that I was unaware of. That being said, this could be improved a lot with people talking about what they think should be changed.
Overall Impressions
My overall impression of this article is that it is very weak and needs a lot of improvement. While what is written is not bad, it only comes from one source and has lots of room for more information to be added.