Betterbid, Nicole. “The Power of Social Media: The Scandal Effect.” Hive Digital, 6 Feb. 2015.[1]
This is a weblog post by Hive Digital, a digital marketing agency. While weblogs are usually not considered reliable sources, they may be used in certain conditions. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Are weblogs reliable sources? states, "Weblog material written by well-known professional researchers writing within their field may be acceptable, especially if hosted by a university, newspaper or employer," so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
EVERETT, ANNA. “Scandalicious: ‘Scandal’, Social Media, and Shonda Rhimes’ Auteurist Juggernaut.” The Black Scholar, vol. 45, no. 1, 2015, pp. 34–43. JSTOR.[2]
This is a journal article, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Weinstein, Shelli, and Shelli Weinstein. “How “Scandal” Paved the Way for ABC’s Twitter-Based “#TGIT” Marketing Strategy.” Variety, 23 Sept. 2014.[3]
This is an article published by Variety, a popular entertainment news website, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
SXSW. “Kerry Washington and the New Rules of Social Stardom | SXSW Convergence 2016.” Youtube, 24 Mar. 2016.[4]
This is a Youtube video of a one-on-one discussion between Kerry Washington and InStyle’s Editorial Director, Ariel Foxman, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
TV Guide Editors. “How Shonda Rhimes’ Scandal Harnessed Twitter to Become a Massive Hit.” TVGuide.com, 21 July 2021.[5]
This is an article published by TV Guide, a digital media company, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in great depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
