User:Who/Discussion log/2007-2010

This user subpage is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.

Fair use image on your user space

Fair use images, like Image:Chippewa michigan logo.gif, are not allowed on user space. Please remove it. Thank you. --Iamunknown 17:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Exemption request has been made. Please allow time for discussion on this topic. Thank you. «»Who ?¿?^meta 23:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I concur! Mindman1 00:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

advocacy request / complaint / problems with cycles articles and categories

I have made an entry http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Association_of_Members%27_Advocates/Requests/February_2007/RayTomes#Questions: which lists your user name. You are by no means the only person about who I am complaining, but I felt that the deletion of category:cycles was one of the worst cases because the vote count you give is so obviously wrong and because you (effectively) accuse me of using sock puppets. Please feel free to add your comments. Ray Tomes 02:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I'd have closed the discussion the same way. There were sockpuppets voting, that is a definite. Who didn't say it was you, if you want to make that assumption, I believe that would be your problem. (Sorry, Who, but this is clearly a waste of your time.) --Kbdank71 04:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand this comment. The vote was actually 3 delete and 5 keep. It is recorded as 4 and 1. Where did the extra delete come from? It is claimed that only 1 vote for keep is real and the rest sock puppets. I know that my vote is real. Therefore if the rest are sock puppets I am most certainly being accused of making all the votes. Can you explain any other interpretation? In point of fact I know who several of the other voters are and they are certainly real people. The accusation of sock puppets is unfounded. The vote count adopted is unjustified. User:Kbdank71's remarks make no sense. Ray Tomes 20:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Therefore if the rest are sock puppets I am most certainly being accused of making all the votes Your logic is faulty. The correct statement would be "Therefore the rest are sock puppets PERIOD". Nobody, not Who, not me, are accusing you of sockpuppetry. Please stop making assumptions. Four deletes: Pjacobi, siafu, G Rutter, rodii. One keep: you. As noted, users that had very few edits were ignored (which, by the way, a year and a half after the CFD, three of the "keep" people still have two edits, and one of them have just one). Again, I myself, had I closed the discussion, would have done the same thing Who did. I hope my comments here make more sense now. --Kbdank71 12:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

LD Bell

All in progress. ;) Thanks for the heads up! Locriani 04:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

CHICOTW GAonhold

	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Chicago Collaboration of the Week
Site A is the current Chicago COTW In the past you have edited Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago. It was the CHICOTW in the recent past. It has been placed on Good article on hold status thanks in part to your efforts. See its GA review and help us raise it towards the good article and eventually featured article classification level. The article was given good article on hold status on February 2, 2007. It will be reevaluated in between 2 and 7 days from this date. Recall that during its tenure as CHICOTW we achieved the following Improvement. See our CHICOTW Improvement History.
Contributing editors: AKeen, L Glidewell, NatusRoma, TheQuandry^*, TonyTheTiger.
	Good article nominee/Good article on hold

TonyTheTiger 23:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Anthony_piccione.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anthony_piccione.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Azorin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Azorin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Ellen-bry.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ellen-bry.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use images on your space Part 2

Who, I know you have not edited since February, and that the fair use image on your user page is a symbol of your tribal ties. It does, however, violate fair use policy, in particular criterion #9, that "Fair use images may be used only in the article namespace." Would you please reconsider removing the image from your user page? —Iamunknown 16:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

yes. sorry been away. i will not contest it now. thanks. «»Who ?¿?^meta 05:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Toonami.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Toonami.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Camp lazlo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Camp lazlo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Nick stahl public domain jpg.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nick stahl public domain jpg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Oliver davis.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Oliver davis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Alisa_reyes_publicity.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alisa_reyes_publicity.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Log date

A template you created, Template:Log date, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you have no objections regarding the deletion, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 00:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Frank_welker_pd.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Frank_welker_pd.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Buddhist polemics

An article that you have been involved in editing, Buddhist polemics, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buddhist polemics. Thank you. linca ^linca 15:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Love Potion No. 9 (1992).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Love Potion No. 9 (1992).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Request for comment on Category Redirect template

Because you are a member of WikiProject Categories, your input is invited on some proposed changes to the design of the {{Category redirect}} template. Please feel free to view the proposals and comment on the template talk page. --Russ (talk) 21:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Bot activity

I was going over the list of bots and noticed that Whobot (talk · contribs) has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Dead_bots since this is a rather widely-posted message. MBisanz ^talk 06:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

USS Palmer

You wouldn't happen to have any further information about the USS Palmer by any chance would you? I would love to find a crew list or anything else applying to the ship. Thanks for your time,

Barry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.79.8.16 (talk) 19:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Nope sorry. Any subjective info can be found on their website. As for a crew list, this information is classified and not for public purview. If you or anyone else has posted or shared this type of information, this is a Federal offense and all persons involved could be criminally charged.

Who (talk) 01:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Tempblockeduser

Template:Tempblockeduser has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 02:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Operation COOKIE MONSTER

Proposed deletion of Alec Medlock

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alec Medlock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CalendarWatcher (talk) 03:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Who/GNAA log

User:Who/GNAA log, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Who/GNAA log and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Who/GNAA log during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Suntag ☼ 07:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC) -- Suntag ☼ 07:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Above mentioned MfD resulted in no consesus. As you're currently off, I've blanked the page until you can evaluate yourself if it still has any use. If not, you can simply tag it with {{db-user}}.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Voice actor

Template:Voice actor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Who/Voice actor

User:Who/Voice actor, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Who/Voice actor and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Who/Voice actor during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the editing of "Alternative Investment" article

Dear Wikipedia, I had edited the article "alternative investment" which was deleted regarding it as a marketing effort. I am a MBA student who came across the information while doing a research on hedgefunds and I wanted to share my knowledge with all. I had also taken the prior permission of the owner to mention the source of the reference article as it is a paid one. Please publish the article again as it was not a marketing effort. If there are any changes to be made before publishing it then please let me know. I will make those changes so that it does not violate the laws.

Best Regards, Sherel D'costa —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherel D'costa (talk • contribs) 11:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Did you know

your last 150 contribs go back to December of 2005? Hope all is well. --Kbdank71 16:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Visitor attractions in Birmingham, England

Proposed deletion of Trevor Blumas

The article Trevor Blumas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No RS found - all I could find were minor mentions (generally in the form "starring a, b, c, Trevor Blumas, ..."). Unsourced for almost 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 10:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Politics of Åland

Fair use rationale for File:Emile galle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Emile galle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 11:02, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Courtenay taylor duck duck goose.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Courtenay taylor duck duck goose.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)