User:Ward3001/Sandbox

My Sandbox

Smoking vandalism

Tom and Jerry vandalism

69.19.14.35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
66.82.9.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christina_Aguilera.jpg
Ward3001 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Ward3001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
span class: 1, 2, 3
Wikipedia:Other stuff exists
Wikipedia:Revert, block, ignore
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
Avoid statements that date quickly
Observations on Wikipedia Behavior
[1]
WP:BADCHARTS
Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films
Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
Ward3001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
http://this-wheel-is-on-fire.blogspot.com/2009_02_01_archive.html <br> http://www.bluesforpeace.com/george-harrison.htm <br> http://www.last.fm/music/George+Harrison/+images/320726

The Wikipedia FAQK
WP:Competence is required

A cumulatively dysfunctional system

Wikipedia's days are numbered, I fear, consumed by its own nonfeasance. Tribes of influential (= have the most free time on their hands) admins and editors have decided that WP policies say something other than what they actually say. They want to have loose reigns to make WP their playground for their own particular agendas. People who follow strict and standardized interpretations of policies threaten that and must be stalked and rebuffed.

The problem on WP is not so much the obvious trolls but the ones who make editing painful for other editors by repetitive questions, tendentious editing, private agendas hidden beneath yet lord of all arguments; immature teenagers and college students who view biographies of living persons as their private political platform rather than a task requiring the utmost responsibility and mature outlook, all in recognition that words can be like flames and real lives can and sometimes really are ruined or at least permanently altered; people who fill up talk pages with nonsense, who see the truth of contrary arguments yet refuse from selfishness to acknowledge them; who endlessly Wikilawyer the most obvious points, and enforce not the policies but the policies as they privately interpret them through the grid of their own private agendas.

Most people like me ended up at Missing Wikipedians much sooner, and many such people are enjoying the heck out of other, more responsible wikis, and some enjoying reading the jabs at places like Wikitruth. The price that has been paid and will continue to be paid until something changes is a Project in the guise of an encyclopedia that cannot even be cited by 1st graders, lest high schoolers. Welcome to your Wikipedia. I am done. CyberAnth 20:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Raymond arritt/Expert withdrawal Proposal:

Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Wikipedia, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.

Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Wikipedia, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.

The bureaucracy should either take corrective steps to fix this situation, or else suffer the eventual loss of huge amounts of valuable talent and volunteered resources.

If you agree with this statement, post it to your pages, and pass it on. (discuss this here)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/WLU-Mystar

http://photobucket.com/mediadetail/?media=http%3A%2F%2Fi12.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa233%2Fits_a_monkeys_wedding%2Fextra%2FZooey%2520Deschanel%2Fsix.jpg&searchTerm=zooey%20deschanel&pageOffset=10

ladnav

Rorschach

Selectively picked words to mispresent a source (an unreliable source at that): here
Doesn't want to do the real in-depth research; asks for information from which he can selectively pick biased information: here
Mispresentated a source: here.
Again selectively picks tidbits of information and misrepresents research: here.
Pretended that he had reviewed literature after reading one journal article: here
Apparently enjoys trolling my sandbox, right Doc? Is that AGF, Doc? You're not the only one who can organize a complaint. here Maybe we should write in code, then we could try to decode each other's codes.
Reminder to myself: Tell the psych staff at the hospital so they can have a good laugh.

Disruptions:
[2]
[3]
[4]

Edit warring [5] [6] [7]

Lied, accusing me of edit warring after one revert: [8]
Ridiculous response [9]

None of your business [10]
CMA [11]
Practicing psychologists [12]
Association ethics [13]
Represent organizations [14]

Chillum

LjL

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rorschach_test&diff=prev&oldid=306406735
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rorschach_test&diff=prev&oldid=306399410
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rorschach_test&diff=prev&oldid=306318774
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rorschach_test&diff=prev&oldid=306302210 :Denigration
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rorschach_test&diff=prev&oldid=306298733 :Mocking denigration and personal attack
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rorschach_test&diff=prev&oldid=306272765 :Denigration; false info about publisher
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ARorschach_test&diff=306102798&oldid=306100095 :Misrepresents "go away"

James

Begin 22:49 Aug 4