User:Walterrichardson/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: English studies
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
I have chosen this article to edit because it is related to my class since my class is an English class.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes it does.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No it doesn't.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes it is.
- Is the content up-to-date? Yes it is.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes there is some missing content.
- Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? Yes it is.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
- Are the sources current? Yes.
- Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
- Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No.
- Are images well-captioned? There are no images.
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? There are no images.
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? There are no images.
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Some conversations are going on about how the article could be written better.
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It was part of a WikiProjects Literature project and it was rated as Start-Class.
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? This isn't a topic we learned in the class specifically it is the type of class we are in.
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status? The article is still being finished up.
- What are the article's strengths? The article seems to have a good introduction.
- How can the article be improved? It needs more precise citations.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article is underdeveloped but it is not poorly developed.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: