Jump to content

User:VisitingPhilosopher/Archive 1/list formatting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Center


Navboxes compared

Parable of the long spoons

Fable of the long spoons

  1. REDIRECT Allegory of the long spoons

interesting way to EDIT the redirect page - example edit-redirect-link

"normal" table.

Navigation templates comparison
1. jump to<br\>section 2. Collapsible 3. Header color 4. Image 5. Groups 6. Style (body)
parameter/s
7.Examples
{{Navbox}} collapsible navbox Left/right of body Yes Yes {{United States Congress}} · {{Solar System}}
{{Navbox with columns}} collapsible navbox Left/right of columns No Yes {{Current U.S. Senators}} · {{Czech lands}}
1. {{Navbox with collapsible groups}} collapsible navbox Left/right of body and/or in each list Yes Yes 7. {{University of Michigan}} · {{Scouting}}
Collapsible attributes
Type CSS classes Javascript Collapses when Custom
initial state
Nesting
Collapsible tables collapsible Defined in Common.js 2 or more autocollapse on page Yes Yes


Policy adherence notes

[edit]

As a new editor on Wikipedia, I have tried to show below how this new section (text above) adheres to the Wikipedia policies which I have read. Please let me know if there are any relevant policies which I have missed. Please let me know if more detail is required in any of the policy adherence notes for this new section I am proposing to add. See the table and following sections.

Policies adhered to: WP:HOWTO WP:VER WP:NPOV WP:N WP:NEO WP:SYN WP:ADVERT WP:ESSAY WP:OPINION WP:ORIG

New article policy-paste

[edit]

Wikipedia policy adherence notes

[edit]

Below shows how the text in the article adheres to Wikipedia policies.

Please add any relevant policies which should also be considered, below.

Also, please add comments if more detail is required for any of the policy adherence notes below.

Dear Editor, Please feel encouraged to be free to edit the article, and be bold. If your additions require re-phrasing, then please note it is because of the Wikipedia policies below and not a reflection on your contribution - please do not be offended if your additions are changed. Many thanks. VisitingPhilosopher (talk) 21:55, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Article Review - Wikipedia policy adherence notes

[edit]

Below shows how the text in the article adheres to Wikipedia policies.

Please add any relevant policies which should also be considered, below.

Any further reviewers, please add comments if more detail is required for any of the policy adherence notes below.

Policies checked in this review: WP:HOWTO WP:VER WP:NPOV WP:N WP:NEO WP:SYN WP:ADVERT WP:ESSAY WP:OPINION WP:ORIG WP:ENC WP:MOS

- edit #1 -
Policy Comment Policy quote Evidence
Shortcode Notes from 3rd parties . .
WP:NEO . Not a neologism see here
WP:VER . Verifiable sources .
WP:N . Notable see here
WP:NPOV . Neutral see here
WP:ORIG . No original research see here
WP:ESSAY . No essays, no original thought or opinions. .
WP:ADVERT . No adverts, no external links whatsoever. .
WP:SYN . No synthesis of ideas. .
WP:HOWTO . No guide-like sentences see here
WP:OPINION . No personal opinions .
WP:LISTPURP . Acts as navigation within wikipedia and the list appears in secondary sources .
WP:MOS . Manual of style - grammar conventions etc see here
WP:ENC . Encyclopedic .
WP:ESSAY . Not an essay - refs for each sentence, so not an essay. .
WP:NOTPAPER . Keeping articles to a reasonable size is important for Wikipedia's accessibility. .
. . . .

Article Review - Wikipedia policy adherence approach taken

[edit]

Below shows how the text in the article adheres to all Wikipedia policies.

Please add any relevant policies which should also be considered, below.

Any further reviewers, please add comments if more detail is required for any of the policy adherence notes below.

Policies checked in this review: WP:HOWTO WP:VER WP:NPOV WP:N WP:NEO WP:SYN WP:ADVERT WP:ESSAY WP:OPINION WP:ORIG WP:LISTPURP WP:ENC WP:MOS WP:NOTPAPER . The table below shows how the article conforms to each of the policies, click on the "see here" link for the proof of policy adherence and usually a place to add your own comments on how the policy guidelines are met fully in the article.

- edit #2 -
Policy Comment Policy quote Evidence
Shortcode Notes from 3rd parties . .
WP:LISTPURP . Acts as navigation within wikipedia and the list appears in secondary sources see here
WP:NEO . Not a neologism See here googbooks
WP:VER . Verifiable sources .
WP:N . Notable See here google
WP:NPOV . Neutral see here
WP:ORIG . No original research see here
WP:ESSAY . No essays, no original thought or opinions. see here
WP:ADVERT . No adverts, no external links whatsoever. .
WP:SYN . No synthesis of ideas. see here
WP:HOWTO . No guide-like sentences see here
WP:OPINION . No personal opinions see here
WP:MOS . Manual of style - grammar conventions etc see here
WP:ENC . Encyclopedic .
WP:ESSAY . Not an essay - refs for each sentence, so not an essay. .
WP:NOTPAPER . Keeping articles to a reasonable size is important for Wikipedia's accessibility. .
. . . .

PRS Not neologism, an apposite term

[edit]

Google searches show that the "Personal Relationship Skills" term is well established for the meaning in the head of the article, and is not a neologism - see the analysis below.

Evidence for "Personal relationship skills" notability

[edit]

This is a review of the closely related terms giving the evidence of the precise taxonomy and nomenclature in this specialist psychology field. The google search for "Personal relationship skills" stays firmly on topic - skills to be used by couples themselves - whereas other related terms have the meanings below:

  1. "Interpersonal skills" - these are work-related management skills - click for evidence >> Interpersonal skills
  2. "Couple skills" - these are skills for counsellors - click for evidence >> Couple skills -
  3. "Intimate relationship skills" - not notable, just 1 book uses the term, in 2012, - click for evidence >> Intimate relationship skills
  4. "Personal relationship skills" term is notable and not a neologism - click for evidence >> Personal relationship skills

PRS Notable

[edit]

Wikiquote uses the term - Wikiquote:Personal relationship Google search links are shown above.

PRS List is in secondary sources

[edit]

This article lists the universal themes from these relationship books, all the skills in this list appearing in all of the books. Therefore following the WP:LISTPURP wikipedia policy.

PRS Neutrality

[edit]

A neutral tone is presented throughout the article, with no advertising tone, balanced statements are used about the article's skills subject. The article includes a "criticism" section. This gives statements and attribution to those who hold opinions which oppose those from the article's main sources - that personal relationship skills can be categorised and learnt.

PRS Originality

[edit]

There is no original thought in the article. There are references to notable sources for all of the statements made in the article. With a reference for each sentence, this article is not in the nature of an essay. There are no original opinions in the article, notable referenced sources are linked to each sentence which appears to have an opinion. Therefore the article conforms to these policies, see links - WP:ORIG WP:ESSAY WP:OPINION

Opinion policy adherence - link to "help the reader" policy

Secondary sources are used to show the people and organisations holding the opinions described in the article. The opinion sources are often provided with quotes, following this policy: "The main point is to help the reader and other editors." ~ policy source: help the reader

PRS Howto

[edit]

The article is not a "howto" guide. There is no guide-like tone in any paragraph. All statements encompass universal themes, there are no verbs which are instructional. The style adheres strictly to simple, broad, statements of the encyclopedic facts.

Review edits

[edit]

To bring into line with WP:MOS some minor edits to the style of the original article were necessary. No content was changed.

Originality

[edit]

Conforms to WP:ORIG when there is no original thought in the article and there are references to notable sources for all of the statements made in the article.

Neutrality

[edit]

A neutral tone is presented throughout the article, with no advertising tone, balanced statements are used.

Scratchpad cheat sheet for Article History table notes

[edit]

Learned industriousness new article used this header:

{{|New unreviewed article|source=ArticleWizard|date=October 2011}}

Possible DYK - There are 34 types of relationship therapy, but the person giving' the therapy is more important than the type of therapy they are using. -- really great to use the ID method to pull up the exact old version of the article... e.g., the DYK page.

Template:ArticleHistory

EDIT to See "Article History" template HIDDEN in comment...>>> here 

<<

Why Wikipedia does not keep new editors: User_talk:Dcharris1 "It's okay, I no longer care. Ciao".

Special:Whatlinkshere/User_talk:Dcharris1

Wikipedia:Arguments_to_make_in_deletion_discussions WP:MANYLINKS