User:VerityIncog/Wilfred Adolphus Domingo/Zachcorliss Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? VerityIncog, Halleylane
• Link to draft you're reviewing: Wilfred Adolphus Domingo

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes it gives a clear and concise introduction to who Wilfred is.
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes the intro sentence is very clear.
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes the Lead includes major sections and links to each.
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, everything the lead has, is included on the article.
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is very concise and to the point

Lead evaluation

The lead is concise and to the point. I like how brief and easy it is to read, while still having links and tags to the article below.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes the content added is relevant and adds to the strength of the article.
• Is the content added up-to-date? From what it seems, the information is up to date and follows the flow of the current article.
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I dont believe that there is information missing. If there is anything, maybe add more to the topics.
• Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes, through his education and experiences, Wilfred was able to share his stories through his writings to educate others.

Content evaluation

I think the group did a good job creating an imagine into WIlfred's life. The ties between his childhood and influences definitely help with the understanding of his later works.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? Yes there is nothing biased from what I can tell.
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No there are no heavy biases in the article.
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I believe the view points are represented well and tie in together in a good manner.
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No the article stays unbiased and gives a good description of the experiences and influences he went through throughout his life.

Tone and balance evaluation

I think the article has a good tone and sticks to the facts. It stays away from the bias and persuading terms. It balances his childhood with the connection to later works.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes it seems that the sources used are both reliable and very informative.
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The articles reflect well into the literature on the topic.
• Are the sources current? The sources seem to be relatively current with the article.
• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes the links span from all different time periods as well as different authors in order to see a large amount of opinion and views on Wilfred's life.
• Check a few links. Do they work? yes the links work

Sources and references evaluation

The sources and references flow well together even though they have their differences. They tie well with the information at hand and help assist readers if they would like more in depth information on certain topics.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes the content is very well written and easy to follow.
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I didnt see any grammatical or spelling errors.
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? I think it was very organized and flowed through his life well.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media N/A

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? yes
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? There is a large amount of variety in the links which makes for a good article.
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? the articles follow the path in order to find information on his life and experience.
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? yes

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I believe it has improved in the flow and growth of the article. I think the writings part is the strongest when it breaks down the meanings of each. Each writing came from his life and growth in the time period.
• What are the strengths of the content added? I think the biggest strength is the writings.
• How can the content added be improved? I think to improve the content the group can possibly show if there is any influence of his writings in more modern times today. This will show the true importance of Wilfred in history.