User:Vdeba001/Pura Vida Bracelets/Sandraventurelli Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Vdeba001.
• Link to draft you're reviewing: Pura Vida Bracelets

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, the lead talks about the points expanded in the content of the article
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The article only have a an about section but it is briefly described in the lead section
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, all the information in the lead is in the article body
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead in concise

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes the content is relevant to the main topic
• Is the content added up-to-date? Yes it is
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think there is missing information when it comes to the actual business but overall the about section does cover a great amount of information about the Pura Vida Bracelets

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? Yes it is
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, all information is neutral
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? I don't think so, The content is about the story of the company, how it was created and what they have achieved

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Mostly all content is backed up. In the lead I found the statistic about the bracelets and it's donations to charity and it was not backed up with a source directly.
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes they are good sources
• Are the sources current? Yes
• Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, they do work

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the content is concise and it is easy to read
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I did not see any grammatical errors
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? For this article there is only one section, about section, and I do think that section reflect what an about section should be about the company.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, there are no pictures
• Are images well-captioned? No images present
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images present
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images present

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes, the article does meet the Wikipedia notability requirements
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The list of sources is not as long and it does represent a good literature about the topic.
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? I believe that this article represent the pattern that Wikipedia articles have since it have a lead and the next section is about. I think that if the article were expanded it would follow the patterns of other Wikipedia articles
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes, it have links to other articles

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I believe it is a new article. The article did have quality infomartion about the business represented
• What are the strengths of the content added? I think that one of the greatest parts about the article is that it has a story that makes the reader want to keep reading and find more information about the Pura Vide Bracelets
• How can the content added be improved? It think more content about the charities that the business contributes to would be a great addition to the article