User:Vdeba001/Pura Vida Bracelets/Caroruguita Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The article only has 1 section so yes
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It can be a bit more concise. Some of the information in the lead is repeated almost verbatim in the other section of the article.

Good but could use a little work

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Maybe some information can be added as to what type of bracelets they are or how they're made. Maybe the former can be shown with the addition of images?

Very good

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? Yes, it's purely factual
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the reader isn't persuaded to do anything

Excellent

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
Are the sources current? Yes
Check a few links. Do they work? They all seemed to work

Excellent

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The section "about" can be broken up further into how the company was started and then a different section on the factors that influenced its growth to the company it is today.

Very good

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, there are no images present
Are images well-captioned? No images present
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images present
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? no images present

Include pictures

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
What are the strengths of the content added? User added a lot of citations which work in strengthening the validity of the article
How can the content added be improved? About section can be broken up and images can be added

Good