User:VarunFEB2003/sandbox 1

VarunFEB2003 User Page   Awards   Subpages   Sandbox   Tools Lab   Guestbook Course According to Wikipedia:Vandalism– Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Examples of typical vandalism are adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page. Vandalism or not What is vandalism Learn about different type of vandalisms here: Wikipedia:Vandalism#Types_of_vandalism What is not vandalism Check out this list to learn what are not vandalism. Example Example Type of vandalism Comment Example Section blanking Disruptive edit, remove almost everything in the article. Example Section blanking, Repeating characters Highly disruptive, this editor should be warned for this kind of edit and actually has been warned too Example BLP issue Unreliable (forum) gossip, non-encyclopedic Test Beginner Question 01 Is this a vandalism? Yes No Answer Yes, this can be considered as vandalism. Question 02 Is this a vandalism? Will you warn the editor for this edit? Yes No Answer No, this is not vandalism. This is just wrong formatting error (see details). You should not post a warning in editor's talk page for this edit, but, you can politely point out their errors. And if you answered correctly, congratulations. See next question. Question 03 Is this a vandalism? Yes No Answer Nopes, you have guessed it right, it is not vandalism. But, like you I also felt this person wasted too many words in describing his relation with the Bengali film actress! Question 04 Is this vandalism? Yes No Answer Not vandalism. But, it can be reverted for grammatical mistake an great, unnecessary adjectives. Question 05 Is this vandalism? Yes No Answer Absolutely! This is User and user talk page vandalism Question 06 Is this a vandalism? Yes No Answer You can call it a vandalism. But I'll not mark it as vandalism. I feel it is silly edit and it definitely not a valid talk page content! Master Question 01 Is this a vandalism? Yes No Answer No, this is not a vandalism. Let me explain– this edit chopped off the entire lower page, so, it seems to be a vandal edit. But, actually Twinkle is responsible for this, not the editor. So, this should not be called vandalism. Question 02 Suppose an editor has added the following content in an article <!--The person who is editing this article and reading this line at this moment is a moron. Hahaha!--> Well I know this is vandalism, that is not the question. The question is– mention the type of this kind of vandalism? Answer Hey, you just can't click to see answer, you have to guess something first. Please guess something and then click on "Show" Or if you already guessed something, apologies, please click on show to verify your answer. Show the real answer This is "hidden vandalism"– if your answer was "hidden content vandalism" or something like that with same meaning, still you are correct. Exact wording not necessary. Learn more about this type of vandalism.