User:Vallion04/Pacific Ocean/Elyybeth Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? Vallion04
• Link to draft you're reviewing: Pacific Ocean

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?yes
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?yes
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?yes
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?yes

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?yes
• Is the content added up-to-date?yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?no
• Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?yes

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?yes
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?no
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?no
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?no

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?yes
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?yes
• Are the sources current?yes
• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?yes
• Check a few links. Do they work?yes

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?yes
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?no
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?yes

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?yes
• Are images well-captioned?yes
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?yes
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?yes

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?yes
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? There are plenty of reliable sources for this article. yes.
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?yes
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?yes

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?I believe that the articles overall content quality is already very good. Just reinforcing that I really like the format of it all.
• What are the strengths of the content added? Every subject has a reliable source to back it up
• How can the content added be improved? The overall content is good