User:Traveler99go/Esther Helton/Luigiface244 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]General info
[edit]- Traveler99go
- Esther Helton
Lead
[edit]- The Lead of the article briefly sums up who the article is about.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content on this topic is all relevant and is up to date. There is not any unnecessary information.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- There are no noticeable biases or any content trying to push a personal opinion.
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The references used thoroughly explain the information given in this article and there are enough articles to be reliable enough for the amount of information given and that is available.
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content is concise, organized well, and easy to read.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- There are no images but for such a not well known person I am certain they must be hard to obtain under Wikipedia's guidelines.
Images and media evaluation
[edit]For New Articles Only
[edit]If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- There are enough sources and it is well constructed.
New Article Evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content was easy to read and understand. It was not a large article giving lots of various information but there is not a whole lot of information available on the subject either.