User:Tmissell/Adam Ragusea/HunterWWW Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Thomas Missell
- Adam Ragusea
Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Lead has been updated
- Lead has sufficient introductory sentence
- Lead missing brief description of main sections
- All info in lead present in article
- Concise lead
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Content added is relevant
- Content is up to date - includes subscriber count, views
- Does not seem to be any content missing, and all content that is present relates back to the topic in a logical way
- None of the content in the article seems to be controversial or addressing any tough subjects. All content is appropriate and relevant
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Content added does not push any bias, is very neutral and informational
- No claims in the article appear heavily biased in any direction, information seems to be neutral
- Seems to be lacking a bit in describing his YouTube career. It says that he launched the channel in 2010, but the information on the channel itself is a bit sparse
- Content added does not try and persuade reader into believing anything about Adam Ragusea other than the facts
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- All new content is backed up by secondary source
- Sources are thorough - a couple of them lead directly to videos off of Ragusea's channel, which is about as accurate as you can get with a topic like this
- Sources are current
- Sources written by diverse authors, coming from many different kinds of sources
- Tested links work
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Content is well written and is blocked off in logical categories
- No grammatical or spelling errors
- Content is well organized into blocks of information that flow well and make sense
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- N/A - no images added
Images and media evaluation
[edit]For New Articles Only
[edit]If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Not a new article
New Article Evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Content added has given a clearer idea of who Adam Ragusea is and provides insight into not only his popular internet persona, but his lesser known personal life as well.
- Strengths include the abundance of links and sources cited
- Content could be improved by expanding on information surrounding his YouTube channel, as well as adding images/media to the article, maybe of Adam himself or the food he cooks