It does not seem that substantial changes have been made by the student, but the lead has been updated for better reading and grammar.
The opening sentence is perfect.
The lead ought to be updated to include a brief description of the article's major sections, including discussion of clear broth beef noodles, braised beef noodles, and other varieties.
It may help strengthen the article if more sections were added, such as popularity in each country the dish is served in, and the history of how the dish became so wide-spread.
A lot of the content is backed up by relevant and seemingly reliable secondary sources, such as Taiwan News, University of Chicago Press, A Culinary Travelogue, or BBC news. A few sources are a little questionable, but ought to be fine since they are balanced by more reliable sources.
There is a section missing references in the "Variations" section (also you might turn Variations into a sub-heading 2)
The links seem to work and are recent enough to still be considered current.
Well organized, although the variations section ought to be a sub-heading.
It is easy to read, but I wonder if the WikiProject Food and Drink have any style guides on how to handle foods with various names in multiple languages?
One sentence has approximately 7 citations attached to it which is more than a little distracting.
Some of the bold text is distracting, especially the bolding of names in the lead. Italicization may be prettier?
More content will probably need to be contributed to raise the class of the article, so you will have to keep up the good work.
If judged on the volume of changes, this article hasn't been improved much but the quality of the changes are important and meaningful contributions to the overall quality of the article.
