User:Technical 13/On Hold

Inactive adopter

Current Adoptees:

Technical 13 (talk)

I'm a Teahouse host, Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy trainee (almost complete), and as an administrator on other wikis I am very familiar with the technical aspects of the system

User:Technical 13

• Technical 13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting filemover ~~~~

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Technical 13

Technical 13

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (?/?/?); Scheduled to end Remove the <!-- and --> around subst: in the template (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request.

Nomination

Technical 13 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Technical 13 (talk) 16:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as a bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?

A:

2. How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?

A:

3. Wikipedians expect bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?

A:

---

Discussion

RfBs for this user:

• Links for Technical 13: Technical 13 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Technical 13 can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.