User:Tasfiaxnawal/Telehealth/Yessel Garcia Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- not sure what was new content or existing content or perhaps you are adding a whole new section but the info used is relevant to the topic
Is the content added up-to-date?
- addresses current issues such as the pandemic but did not cite the years that your sources were published so not completely sure if it is "up to date"
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- I don't think so
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
- does not address historically underrepresented populations or topics but maybe you can add how the pandemic has disproportionally affected black and brown bodies more due to lack of funds and provide historical context as to why this true

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
- yes
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- no
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- no
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- no, it provides examples of revisions/expansions and the difficulties of Telehealth

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- don't know which content is new or existing but only one sentence/ claim was cited and I don't know if it was reliable because I don't know where it is from
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- I don't necessarily think so, perhaps adding more sources to these ideas would be very helpful
Are the sources current?
- Im not sure if the source used was published in 2009 but if it was it is not super current
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
- there was only one author cited and I don't know anything else other than their last name
Check a few links. Do they work?
- there are no links

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- yes
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- in the sentence that starts by "Telehealth through phones have especially risen during the COVID-19 pandemic..." I think you should change have to has
- some sentences so seem a bit long but overall should be fine
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- yes, I like that it was separated in mini sections, it made it easier to read

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- not sure if the whole section was added but if it was I believe that it you provide valuable info about the topic
What are the strengths of the content added?
- the fact that you included a relevant issue regarding the pandemic
How can the content added be improved?
- maybe by adding more sources to back up your content and linking the sources so other readers can see them