Jump to content

User:TanishaT/Cooperative breeding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cooperative Breeding

[edit]

Lead and Subsequent Information from original article

-

-

-

-

Mammals

[edit]

Across all mammalian species, less than 1% exhibit cooperative breeding strategies.[1] Phylogenetic analysis shows evidence of fourteen discrete evolutionary transitions to cooperative breeding within the class Mammalia.[2] These lineages are nine genera of rodents (Cryptomys, Heterocephalus, Microtus, Meriones, Rhabdomys, Castor, Atherurus and two in Peromyscus), four genera in Carnivora (Alopex, Canis, Lycaon, and in mongooses), and one genera of primates (Callitrichidae).[2] Cooperative breeding in mammals is not limited to these stated lineages, rather they are significant evolutionary events that provide the framework for understanding the origins and evolutionary pressures of cooperative breeding. All of these evolutionary transitions have occurred in lineages that had a socially monogamous or solitary breeding system, suggesting that strong kinship ties are an essential factor the evolutionary history of cooperative breeding.[2] [3] Additionally, polytocy, or the birth of multiple offspring per birthing episode, is a highly correlated evolutionary determinant of cooperative breeding in mammals. [1] These two factors, social monogamy and polytocy, are not evolutionary associated, suggesting that they independent mechanisms leading to the evolution of cooperative breeding in mammals.[3] The global distribution of mammals with cooperative breeding systems is widespread across various climatic regions, but evidence shows that the initial transitions to cooperative breeding are associated to species in regions of high aridity. [1]

Canids (from original article)

[edit]

New Addition: Cooperative breeding increases the rate of reproduction in females and decreases the litter size. [1]

Meerkats (from original article)

[edit]

Primates

[edit]

In most non-human primates, the reproductive success and survival of offspring is highly dependent to the mother's ability to produce food resources. [4] Therefore, one component of cooperative breeding is the delegation of offspring holding, which allows the mother to forage without the added costs of holding her offspring.[4] Additionally, in primate species with cooperative breeding systems, females have shorter interbirth intervals. Female grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) form social groups and cooperatively breed with closely related female kin. The females benefit from sharing limited nesting spaces and increased nest defense but do not exhibit food provisioning behaviors as they are solitary foragers. [5]

Humans

[edit]

Direct expression of cooperative breeding includes facultative parental care, including alloparenting, and extended post-menopausal lifespan in females, which forms the basis of the Grandmother Hypothesis.[6] Cooperative breeding in humans is theorized as the optimal solution to high energetic costs of survival due to nature of human diet, which involved high-quality foods often in need of processing and cooking.[7] Additionally, food provisioning in cooperate breeding societies may explain the relatively short period of weaning in humans, typically two to three years, when compared to non-human apes who wean their offspring for upwards of six years.[7]

Human offspring do not fall neatly into the dichotomous categorization of precocial versus altricial, and instead Portmann proposes they are "secondarily altricial" at birth due to the underdevelopment of neurological and cognitive capabilities.[8] Therefore, human offspring are highly dependent on caregiver investment, a necessity that serves as the precursor for theories on the development of pair-bonding, alloparenting, and cooperative breeding.[8] The evolution of cooperative breeding in early Homo species also promoted other pro-social behaviors such as social learning, increased social tolerance, and shared intentionality especially in food acquisition.[9] Additionally, pro-social behaviors in cooperative breeding in humans had a by-product effect of enhancing cognitive capabilities, especially in social tasks involving coordination. [6]

Human mother's tend to have overlapping, dependent offspring due to shorter interbirth intervals, high fertility rates, and low infant mortality rates, thus imposing high energetic costs. [4]Unlike other species with cooperative breeding systems, human female "helpers" do not incur the cost of reproductive suppression at the benefit of a single, dominant breeding mother.[4] Instead, cooperative breeding is highly prevalent among grandparents, and juveniles, who are generally not competing for mating opportunities.[4] This intergenerational flow of resources supports the theory of mutualism as an evolutionary pathway to cooperative breeding in humans. [4]

  1. ^ a b c d Lukas, Dieter; Clutton-Brock, Tim (2017). "Climate and the distribution of cooperative breeding in mammals". Royal Society Open Science. 4 (1): 160897. doi:10.1098/rsos.160897. ISSN 2054-5703. PMC 5319355. PMID 28280589.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  2. ^ a b c Lukas, Dieter; Clutton-Brock, Tim (2012-06-07). "Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1736): 2151–2156. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2468. PMC 3321711. PMID 22279167.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  3. ^ a b Lukas, Dieter; Clutton-Brock, Tim (2012-10-07). "Life histories and the evolution of cooperative breeding in mammals". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1744): 4065–4070. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1433. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 3427589. PMID 22874752.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  4. ^ a b c d e f Kramer, Karen L. (2010-09-23). "Cooperative Breeding and its Significance to the Demographic Success of Humans". Annual Review of Anthropology. 39 (1): 417–436. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105054. ISSN 0084-6570.
  5. ^ Eberle, Manfred; Kappeler, Peter M. (2006-08-01). "Family insurance: kin selection and cooperative breeding in a solitary primate (Microcebus murinus)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 60 (4): 582–588. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0203-3. ISSN 1432-0762.
  6. ^ a b van Schaik, Carel P.; Burkart, Judith M. (2010), Kappeler, Peter M.; Silk, Joan (eds.), "Mind the Gap: Cooperative Breeding and the Evolution of Our Unique Features", Mind the Gap: Tracing the Origins of Human Universals, Springer, pp. 477–496, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_22, ISBN 978-3-642-02725-3, retrieved 2020-02-29
  7. ^ a b Kramer, Karen L. (2014-03-01). "Why What Juveniles Do Matters in the Evolution of Cooperative Breeding". Human Nature. 25 (1): 49–65. doi:10.1007/s12110-013-9189-5. ISSN 1936-4776.
  8. ^ a b Dunsworth, Holly M.; Warrener, Anna G.; Deacon, Terrence; Ellison, Peter T.; Pontzer, Herman (2012-09-18). "Metabolic hypothesis for human altriciality". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (38): 15212–15216. doi:10.1073/pnas.1205282109. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3458333. PMID 22932870.
  9. ^ Isler, Karin; van Schaik, Carel P. (2012-07-01). "Allomaternal care, life history and brain size evolution in mammals". Journal of Human Evolution. 63 (1): 52–63. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.03.009. ISSN 0047-2484.