Jump to content

User:Tangotango/RfA Analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pages in my userspace: User Page | Talk page | G | T | S | Tangobot | RfA Analysis | Report | Toolserver account

This page is about my RfA Analysis Library, which is used by my toolserver tool, RfA Analysis (available here), and my RfA Analysis bot (whose latest report can be seen here).

The latest source code for the library is available here. It is written in PHP and is licensed under the GNU General Public License.

Latest reports

[edit]

Use {{Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report}} and {{User:Tangotango/RfA Analysis/Report}} to transclude these reports onto other pages.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Worm That Turned 259 4 7 98 Open 09:47, 18 November 2024 1 day, 20 hours no report


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Worm That Turned 2 259 4 7 98 09:47, 18 November 2024 1 day, 20 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 12:47, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Known Issues with the Signature Detection

[edit]

An inherent problem with analyzing signatures is that people use different styles, and some even fail to include them at all in their votes. These are some known issues with the signature detection in the Library.

# Description Status
1 If a user (1) uses a non-standard timestamp (i.e., something that isn't 08:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)), and (2) their vote is subsequently moved, and (3) the mover happens to append their own signature on (4) the same line as the original vote, the vote will be flagged as belonging to the mover. I'm hoping that this is not a common problem. I haven't been able to find instances of this yet. On hold
2 If a user uses a link to their contributions as the only link in their signature, the signature will not be detected. (I'm sure I've seen this before in an RfA, I just can't find it - can anyone point me in the right direction? - will fix once an example has been found) Pending specimen
3 If a user does not use any links in their signature, the signature detection will fail. (e.g., Nephron in Joturner's 1st nomination) Will not fix
4 If a user separates their vote and signature with a new line (like the unsigned Liberal2006 has done in Bucketsofg's nomination), detection will fail Fixed in 1.09c (iffy mode 1)
5 If (1) a user includes more than one link to a user page (like Werdna648, who has a link to Werdnabot in his sig), and (2) the link to the non-user user page (in this case, Werdnabot) comes later, the vote will be flagged as coming from the non-voting user. (Werdnabot) Will not fix
6 If User:ExampleYY posts a vote like the following (i.e., inclusion of a sig/timestamp combination before their actual sig/timestamp), User:ExampleXX will be flagged as the voter.
ExampleXX posted something at 09:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC), you know. - ExampleYY 09:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
On hold
7 If user uses "#:", "#*", or "##" to denote multiple lines in their vote, signature will not be detected (Zappa.jake and Bookofjude) Fixing (iffy mode 2)