User:Tamwin/Cummings v. Missouri
This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Cummings v. Missouri | |
---|---|
Argued Mar 14 - 19, 1866 Decided Jan 14, 1867 | |
Full case name | Cummings v. Missouri |
Citations | 71 U.S. 277 (more) |
Holding | |
A requirement that state officers and priests swear that they have not acted against the union is unconstitutional, because it is a bill of attainder, punishing the accused by legislative decree rather than trial, and because it is an ex post facto law, which punishes people for deeds that may not have been crimes at the time they were done. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Field, joined by Nelson, Grier, Clifford, and Wayne |
Dissent | Miller, joined by Chase, Swayne, and Davis |
Cummings v. Missouri, 71 U.S. 277 (1867), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that attempts to require officials to swear that they had not supported the Confederates in the Civil War were unconstitutional as an ex post facto law and bill of attainder.
Background
[edit]An amendment to the Missouri Constitution, adopted in 1865, required all voters, state officials, priests, teachers, and corporate officers to swear an oath, known as the Oath of Loyalty. They were required to swear that they had not aided the Confederates in the Civil War, evaded the draft, or engaged in any of a host of other activities deemed disloyal.[1]
References
[edit]- ^ "Cummings v. State Of Missouri". FindLaw.