User:Smallchief/Mora Land Grant
Mora Land Grant 35°58′27″N 105°19′48″W / 35.9742°N 105.330°W
Description
[edit]The Mora Land Grant was a 827,621 acres (3,349.26 km2) (1,293 square miles)[1] Mexican land grant mostly in Mora County, New Mexico. The grant land extended from the Great Plains west of the town of Wagon Mound for about 40 miles (64 km) west to the crest of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains with elevations ranging from about 6,500 ft (2,000 m) on the eastern border to 12,835 ft (3,912 m) at Jicarita Peak on the western border. The grant included the upper drainage basin of the Mora River, a tributary of the Canadian River. Most of the agricultural settlements on the grant were along the Mora River and its tributaries in valleys at elevations of 7,100 ft (2,200 m) to 7,600 ft (2,300 m) and ringed by mountains. The largest settlement in the grant area is the community of Mora which had a population of 547 in 2020.[2][3]
History
[edit]Indian warfare kept the colony of New Mexico from expanding for almost two centuries after its creation. After a durable peace was negotiated in 1786 between the Comanche and the colony of New Mexico, Hispanic settlers from west of the Rocky Mountains began to migrate to Mora, east of the Rockies, to establish ranching and farming settlements. The settlers were from Trampas, Embudo, and Picuris. In 1818, 76 settlers in what was called Lo de Mora requested the establishment of a Catholic church in the valley. In 1835, the Mayor of Trampas, Manuel Antonio Sanchez, journeyed to the Mora Valley to establish the government there, organize settlements, and legalize the informal land tenure system by distributing land to settlers. He established (or recognized) the town of Santa Gertrudis (present day Mora) and distributed land to forty settlers. He also founded the settlement of San Antonio in the upper valley of the Mora river and distributed land there to 29 settlers. Long, narrow strips of land bordering on the Mora River were given to each farmer so that each had access to irrigation water. That pattern of land ownership is still seen in the Mora Valley. As usual in New Mexican land grants, most of the grant land not suitable for irrigation was designated as common land for grazing and timber cutting.[4][5]
Governor Albino Perez created the Mora Land Grant on September 28, 1835. Its boundaries contained 827,621 acres (334,926 ha) of land. The Mora Grant was one of several large land grants created by the government of New Mexico to establish a buffer zone and fend off the encroaching Anglo-Americans.[6]
The United States invaded New Mexico in 1846 and in 1848 the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo codified U.S. control of the territory conquered from Mexico. The treaty promised that that United States would respect the property rights of the people in New Mexico.[7] A U.S. military post, Fort Union, was established on grant land in 1851. The peace with the Comanche ceased with the conquest of New Mexico and raids by the Comanche and other tribes again became a problem. In 1854 the U.S. Congress created the office of the Surveyor General of New Mexico to determine the legality of the many land grants in New Mexico and in 1876 the U.S. affirmed the rights to the land of the original 76 grantees and their ancestors on the Mora grant lands.[8][9]
The economy of the inhabitants of the Mora Grant was concentrated on semi-subsistence agriculture, grazing large herds of cattle and sheep, timber, and migratory labor. The Santa Fe Trail passed through the eastern part of the grant, but a railroad supplanted it after its completion in 1879. The wool industry became important with a market for the trade in Wagon Mound, just outside the eastern boundary of the Mora Grant. Wheat was the most important crop. Seven flour mills dotted the Mora Valley with Fort Union a major customer until its closure in 1891.[10][11]
Acequias
[edit]The population of the Mora grant grew rapidly and by 1870 numbered 8,000. Water to irrigate crops was scarce. At an unknown date before 1835, the settlers began construction of irrigation ditches (acequias) to bring water from the headwaters of the Rio Pueblo on the western side of the Sangre de Cristo mountains to the Mora River on the eastern side. The largest of three acequias took 20 families three years to construct from 1879 to 1882. This acequia was 8 mi (13 km) long and "constructed without the benefit of sophisticated tools and engineering know-how, accomplishing the seemingly impossible task" of bringing water from one side of the mountains to the other.[12]
The transfer of water was controversial. The Picuris Pueblo contested the diversion of water from their territory to the Mora grant. Disputes about water continued into the 21st century.[13]
Land disputes
[edit]Land speculators, attorneys, and politicians in American-controlled New Mexico, called the Santa Fe Ring, realized "that a fortune lay in the legal process of quieting [obtaining] title to the disputed Spanish and Mexican land grants." The land of the large Mora grant was among the targets of the members of the Santa Fe Ring.[14]
In 1875 and 1876, New Mexican politician Stephen B. Elkins used his influence to have the common lands of the Mora Grant designated by the U.S. government as the property of the original 76 settlers and their descendants rather than as the common property of the community of several thousand residents on grant land. Each of those 76 settlers thus became owners of 10,890 acres (4,410 ha) of the common lands in the grant. However, in the years previous to that designation, Elkins and his partner and brother-in-law attorney Thomas B. Catron had bought land rights from many of the original settlers who believed that the common lands were community property rather than individual property and that their rights to the land were of little monetary value.[15] Elkins and Catron paid as little as twenty dollars to individuals for their land rights.[16]
Elkins, Catron, and allies had claims to 600,000 acres (240,000 ha) of land in the Mora grant but ran into legal difficulty with the residents who refused to pay rent or otherwise acknowledge their ownership. The legal machinations continued for decades. Elkins and Catron were never able to establish their ownership, nor realize any profit from their claims to the land. In 1916, a partition suit resulted in the sale of the Mora grant commons and the residents, most of whom were unaware of the court action, lost their rights and access to the former common lands. Most of the land was eventually acquired by large cattle ranchers. In 1931, 41,397 acres (16,753 ha) in the former grant area was deeded by an owner to the U.S. Forest Service in exchange for lumber rights in the state of Washington.[17][18]
References
[edit]- ^ "Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo" (PDF). General Accounting Office. General Accounting Office of the U.S. 2001. p. 25.
- ^ "P1. Race – Mora CDP, New Mexico: 2020 DEC Redistricting Data (PL 94-171)". U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved December 19, 2024.
- ^ Shadow, Robert D.; Rodriguez-Shadow, Maria (1995). "From Reparticion to Partition: A History of the Mora Land Grant, 1835-1916". New Mexico Historical Review. 70 (3): 257–260. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
- ^ Shadow & Rodriguez-Shadow 1995, pp. 257–259.
- ^ Schlanger, Sarah H.; Goodman, Linda J. (1993). "Archaeology Notes 97" (PDF). Office of Archaeological Studies. Museum of New Mexico. pp. 34–36. Retrieved 17 December 2024.
- ^ "La Merced de Santa Gertrudis de lo de Mora (Mora Land Grant)". Mora Magazine. Retrieved 20 December 2024.
- ^ Treaty 2001, pp. 4–5.
- ^ Shadow & Rodriguez-Shadow 1995, pp. 259–261.
- ^ Shlanger & Goodman 1993, pp. 34–36.
- ^ Shlanger & Goodman 1993, pp. 38–40.
- ^ Boyle, Molly (2021). "See the Historic Mills of the Mora Valley". New Mexico Magazine. Retrieved 20 December 2024.
- ^ Ebright, Malcolm (2017). "Making Water Run Uphill: The Mora Acequias de la Sierra vs Picuris Pueblo". New Mexico Historical Review. 92 (2): 117-118, 147. Retrieved 20 December 2024.
- ^ Ebright 2017, pp. 142–144.
- ^ Lamar, Howard R. (1960). "Political Patterns in New Mexico and Utah Territories, 1850-1860". Utah Historical Quarterly. 28 (4): 362–387. doi:10.2307/45059003. JSTOR 45059003.
- ^ Shadow & Rodriguez-Shadow 1995, p. 279.
- ^ Shadow & Rodriguez-Shadow 1995, pp. 279–287.
- ^ Schlanger & Goodman 1993, pp. 35–38.